Results 1 to 15 of 187

Thread: IPv6 Support

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands - Eindhoven
    Posts
    1,767
    Quote Originally Posted by lly View Post
    Bad news - kernel 2.4.X don't support ipv6 connection tracking(ip6_conntrack) at all. And nobody done backport from 2.6 line
    http://www.linux-ipv6.org/ml/usagi-users/msg02587.html
    But ip6_conntrack is highly independent, so I think it isn't difficult
    to port it to Linux 2.4. Please try below.
    maybe when there is more time we can give it a shot?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Russia, Moscow
    Posts
    3,640
    Quote Originally Posted by wpte View Post
    http://www.linux-ipv6.org/ml/usagi-users/msg02587.html
    maybe when there is more time we can give it a shot?
    I found this link. It is real task, but since nobody done it, seems to be it is not so easy.
    Unfortunately, I haven't enough time to do this backport. We will be happy if someone send us patches against 2.4.3x.

    What your opinion about significance of TCPMSS for ipv6?
    Last edited by lly; 14-11-2009 at 13:56.

  3. #3
    Just set up ipv6 tunnel via http://tunnelbroker.net, works fine


    btw, do we need following (for the first approach without detailed ifs names)?

    iptables -I FORWARD -p ipv6 (-i/o sixtun/br0) - j ACCEPT
    iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -p ! ipv6 ... -j MASQUERADE
    Last edited by theMIROn; 15-11-2009 at 21:16.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Russia, Moscow
    Posts
    3,640
    Quote Originally Posted by theMIROn View Post
    btw, do we need following (for the first approach without detailed ifs names)?

    iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -p ! ipv6 ... -j MASQUERADE
    nat is absent for IPv6

    Quote Originally Posted by kamil View Post
    My scripts write in other routers where base system is linux with kernel 2.6.x
    You are happy man
    One more question - have you ever use TCPMSS for IPv6?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by lly View Post
    nat is absent for IPv6
    yep, it's abs useless for that, in case or routed ipv6 range

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands - Eindhoven
    Posts
    1,767
    I have the new build and it works great
    I'm proudly running:
    1.9.2.7-d-r815
    is it just me or is that portscanner from he.net quite slow?
    maybe I'll make a c# ipv6 portscanner, you need a mono version theMIROn?

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by wpte View Post
    I have the new build and it works great
    is it just me or is that portscanner from he.net quite slow?
    maybe I'll make a c# ipv6 portscanner, you need a mono version theMIROn?
    what for?
    he.net uses nmap 5.00, you could use the same from optware.

    btw, http://wpte.crabdance.com/ isn't accessable via ipv6, but themiron.ru is =)

Similar Threads

  1. New oleg firmware version
    By Lesiuk in forum WL-500gP Firmware Discussion
    Replies: 713
    Last Post: 13-05-2016, 04:55
  2. Broadcom 63xx SOCs support in linux-mips and OpenWrt
    By goundoulf in forum WL-600g Firmware Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22-10-2008, 17:48
  3. About to remove IPv6 support from the firmware
    By Oleg in forum WL-500g Firmware Releases
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25-04-2008, 18:51
  4. HOWTO use your WL-500g as IPv6 router
    By phedny in forum WL-500g/WL-500gx Tutorials
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 17-02-2008, 07:19

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •