Thanks for your reply.

I'm not sure that forum is right place to share my thoughts, but I will try.

In my opinion there is some inconsistency in firmware developers actions:
- 2.4 branch is now discontinued - ok I understand, newer kernel is, without doubts, right direction of development. And probably maintenace of two branches was too difficult.
- 2.6 has much more possibilities, mabe faster, more stable, has better architecture.
- But current firmwares lacks some functionallity that existed in 2.4 branch. As you write - because not all has been tested.
- I understand the need of properly tested components of software, but I also know much Open Source Community can help with tests. It is one of the main benefit.
- But when there is no functionallity available to test (because it is not tested yet) then there is no place to help - then you can't use community to improve software.

I know, that missing modules can be compiled in by users, but not every user has knowledge/time to do it, and by this should not be excluded as valuable tester.

I suggest to separate functinallity to this tested - and untested, but also available to users ie.: modules.tar.gz, and modules-untested.tar.gz.