Results 1 to 15 of 128

Thread: Wondershaper QoS discussion

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,308
    Interesting setup. A question:
    Why aren't you putting webserver traffic into 1:20 or even 1:30 and Skype into 1:10 and let it borrow bandwith from 1:10 when it's available. This seems to me like a much simpler approach and it doesn't limit Skype as much (it can then use as much as needed).

    Also, putting webserver traffic into the high priority class will potentially slow down ICMP traffic I guess.
    Last edited by Styno; 31-08-2006 at 12:54.

Similar Threads

  1. WonderShaper/tc IP filtering
    By kolaf in forum WL-500g Q&A
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-08-2005, 15:34
  2. wondershaper howto?
    By rexster in forum WL-500g Q&A
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-05-2005, 14:06
  3. Wondershaper in Post-Firewall
    By britnet in forum WL-500g Q&A
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-03-2005, 12:46
  4. Slow performance of WL-HDD - Discussion
    By Oleg in forum WL-HDD Q&A
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 21-11-2004, 21:07
  5. Would it be possible to implement wondershaper?
    By Snigel in forum WL-500g Custom Development
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 26-06-2004, 20:22

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •