Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Asus routers: past and future reflection

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    259

    Asus routers: past and future reflection

    It was back in 2004 when I bought my Asus WL-500g. It was one of those state-of-the-art home routers at that time. Features like open source, USB port or having 802.11g made that router my favourite on the market, not to mention the very good forum that supported it called chupa.nl those days. It was after about one year when I started to suffer from its limitations like USB1.1 or slow processor for having external mass storage connected to it.

    Then came WL-500g Deluxe which mainly added USB2.0 and some more speed -from 125MHz to 200MHz. All the new specifications were not revolutionary enough for me to go for it.

    Then the WL-500g Premium arrived providing again more speed as well as the possibility to expand the RAM up to 128MB via an unofficial documented mod. This was a go for me. All the services I installed on my WL-500g where anxiously devouring the 16MB of RAM it had. I sold my old Asus 500g and bought a brand new WL-500gP.

    Today I feel somehow that Asus is getting behind the leading thread when it comes to attending the demands on home wireless routers. The absence of having a home router able to deal with VLAN's/Trunks, double simultaneous radio 2.4GHz and 5GHz or multiple SSID is something I would consider a must to be up there. Note that I am not talking about a low budget router.

    Today a home data network is an environment where multiple devices coexists demanding different services and security levels that somehow Asus is not satisfying. TV's demanding Full-HD (media VLAN or 5GHz 802.11n), streaming music, torrents, own web server on DMZ VLAN segment, guests that come with own laptop or iPhone/iPad (guest Wi-Fi), etc are some of the examples experienced today to which Asus seems does not have an answer. Nevertheless the new not lunched yet model RT-N76U seems to provide some answers to today's modern home wireless router requirements at least hardware wise, still to see the firmware/software part of it.

    My question now is: Is Asus to fulfil the needs on modern home networking and return to the leading position?
    twitter

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands - Eindhoven
    Posts
    1,767
    Quote Originally Posted by Tamadite View Post
    My question now is: Is Asus to fulfil the needs on modern home networking and return to the leading position?
    Probably long...
    They obviously don't spend as much time in making good firmware simply because they don't want to invest in that too much.
    The firmware is no longer for the more advanced users, but they design it to be easy to use, while remaining slow

    On hardware asus is working imo.
    Soon they'll releae the rt-n76u, the router that the rt-n16 shoud have been: with 5GHz

    also the RT-N56U is interesting, not because it has bad internal intennas, but because it uses a different chip manufacturer
    might be a hint that asus is heading to a different manufacturer for more power... dunno

    asus is more into motherboards, laptops and soundcards at the moment. not too many people are aware of asus networking products (around here). They usually go for netgear or something, because the salesman says its from cisco... great

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by wpte View Post
    The firmware is no longer for the more advanced users, but they design it to be easy to use
    There you have an interesting point: Asus developing a robust, powerful and well documented open source platform to be used by forums like this one for further developments whilst they (Asus) can just develop an easy user interface for average home users. More or less is what has happened so far.

    It is worth mentioning that Asus did a sort of "open hardware platform" when they launched the WL-500gP. It allowed skilled owners to further improve the device by memory upgrade, adding extra USB ports, changing wireless PCI cards, adding console ports, etc.

    An open software and hardware platform with basic but relevant functionality for basic home users together with the support of forums like this may be a turn to bring home networking into a new direction.

    An Internet community can easily join efforts to develop software. Rather more complicated is to have an Internet community to develop hardware than exploiting it. Why don't to take advantage of this synergy?
    twitter

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    259
    It seems Netgear has somehow taken the lead on this topic. Interesting to see:

    Netgear WNDR3700
    ============
    680 MHz powerful MIPS 32-bit processor
    Memory: 8 MB flash and 64 MB RAM
    Simultaneous Dual Band 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz
    Multiple SSID
    Gigabit Ethernet ports
    USB port
    Netgear website Retail Price $169.99

    Some users claim it uses a branded version of OpenWRT.

    At the same time Netgear is merchandising routers on their website as "open-source routers" supporting community website http://myopenrouter.com
    twitter

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands - Eindhoven
    Posts
    1,767
    imo the cpu is nice
    but not a lot of ram or flash... meh
    furthermore, I'm not a real fan of netgear

    the fact that they have a community site, that promotes alternative firmware is great. But I think that way it's also hard to find the best firmware for you, due to the vast amount types of firmwares
    Also their website is for their products only, which I do understand from corporate view, but I'd rather have a website for every good router

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •