New oleg firmware version

[Lesiuk]

I second that... if you look at a modern day machine you can do a benchmark, which gives you a decrypt speed of about 250mb/s this is straight in the ram which can go over 1500mb/s.
and that with a quad core..
so how would a slow 3,5mb/s usb harddrive with even a slower cpu perform?

usb in that router can work faster than 3,5 mb/s

[root@LesiukNET www]$ hdparm -tT /dev/discs/disc0/disc

/dev/discs/disc0/disc:
 Timing cached reads:    58 MB in  2.00 seconds =  29.00 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:   20 MB in  3.25 seconds =   6.15 MB/sec

29 MB/s its 230 mbit

[wpte]

usb in that router can work faster than 3,5 mb/s

[root@LesiukNET www]$ hdparm -tT /dev/discs/disc0/disc

/dev/discs/disc0/disc:
 Timing cached reads:    58 MB in  2.00 seconds =  29.00 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:   20 MB in  3.25 seconds =   6.15 MB/sec

29 MB/s its 230 mbit

true, but it's not exactly the effective speed in applications
the lack of enough ram is probably the most one to blame for that

I was talking about mb/s not mbit/s btw

mine goes even faster

/dev/discs/disc0/disc:
 Timing cached reads:    86 MB in  2.02 seconds =  42.57 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:   28 MB in  3.10 seconds =   9.03 MB/sec

/dev/discs/disc1/disc:
 Timing cached reads:    76 MB in  2.00 seconds =  38.00 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:   30 MB in  3.02 seconds =   9.93 MB/sec 

[My_Name_Is_Neo]

Hi Everyone.
I am running original Oleg's 1.9.2.7-10 firmware version on my WL-500w.
I had set it up with this firmware when i bought it back in May09. I wanted to upgrade the firmware to this new version on google code which is r665 currently. I dont have a very good reason to upgrade but I just like my gadgets to be up-to-date :P.
Now i have 2 questions -
1. Is there a changelog of what has been improved/changed over in these builds. There is no info on googlecode page and even after translation I am not able to make sense out of the Russian thread it links to.
2. I could not find a good walkthru which talks about updating the firmware. so here is my plan.
a. Restore to factory settings
b. Flash via Web-Interface
c. Re-do wengi's guide instructions again. I'll have to wipe the /opt directory. right?

Can a helpful soul point me to right direction?
Thanks

[lly]

1. Is there a changelog of what has been improved/changed over in these builds. There is no info on googlecode page and even after translation I am not able to make sense out of the Russian thread it links to.

Look better History of Changes

2. I could not find a good walkthru which talks about updating the firmware. so here is my plan.
a. Restore to factory settings
b. Flash via Web-Interface
c. Re-do wengi's guide instructions again. I'll have to wipe the /opt directory. right?

Like all Oleg FW's - a & b - yes. You can leave /opt as is - FW don't know about it content. Probable, you have to change some scripts due to updated utils.

[wpte]

Look better History of Changes

still got a question about that... the webstr module works great, but are the meta keywords also scanned?
works quite good

[My_Name_Is_Neo]

Look better History of Changes

Like all Oleg FW's - a & b - yes. You can leave /opt as is - FW don't know about it content. Probable, you have to change some scripts due to updated utils.

Thanks lly.
My bad I should have looked harder. looks like lots of new patches to the system.

[lly]

still got a question about that... the webstr module works great, but are the meta keywords also scanned?
works quite good

It is not our module, no documentation Seems to be, meta is not checked.

[weixing]

I am running bitcomet and it tells me that the upnp device cannot be found. How to resolve?

[theMIROn]

I am running bitcomet and it tells me that the upnp device cannot be found. How to resolve?

check for upnp is running

ps | grep upnp

[weixing]

check for upnp is running

ps | grep upnp

it's running!
141 admin 1992 S upnp -D -L br0 -W ppp0

but just bitcomet cannot detect a upnp device is present. Any solutions?

[wpte]

I used bitcomet a while, and it might not have all the right standards I think

utorrent has no problem portforwarding, since it uses the windows api for upnp portforwarding.

just like this program: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/IP/PortForward.aspx

also I noticed that programs like limewire, xfire and world of warcraft work perfectly fine.

[wpte]

I just update lighttpd and noticed it wouldn't start anymore...
after entering debug mode:

lighttpd -D -f /opt/etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf
fdevent_linux_sysepoll.c.131: epoll_create failed (Function not implemented), try to set server.event-handler = "poll" or "select"
fdevent.c.47: event-handler linux-sysepoll failed, try to set server.event-handler = "poll" or "select"

epoll is something that should be included in the kernel as far as I know... and it has been the standard option for lighttpd since a long time
is there going to be epoll support or is this another bad compilation?

[lly]

epoll is something that should be included in the kernel as far as I know...

To use epoll program has to be compiled with our toolchain, since standard headers for 2.4 doesn't include epoll syscalls.

[theMIROn]

looks like optware guys should turn off epoll usage wiithin lighttpd's mkfile and/or apply some patch.

[wpte]

looks like optware guys should turn off epoll usage wiithin lighttpd's mkfile and/or apply some patch.

I seriously don't get why so many packages change constantly without the same settings
ah well... it's fixed now I guess.

Any chance of ipv6 coming back? according to libc http://wl500g.info/showthread.php?t=21119 it works on 1.9.2.7-10.

I know I'm a bit nagging atm