Have you given execute rights to the post-firewall file (chmod +x post-firewall) ?Originally Posted by FIB
Does the text of the post-firewall file begin with #!/bin/sh ? (is necessary!)
For me this works only if I disable the firewall and then not all my unused ports are stelth. Anyone with the same problem?Originally Posted by kdudl
As a workaround for the missing firewall I created this Virtual Server List:
Port Range Local IP Local Port Protocol
1:20 192.168.1.200 1 BOTH
22:79 192.168.1.200 1 BOTH
81:65535 192.168.1.200 1 TCP
80 192.168.1.1 8080 TCP
16384:16482 192.168.1.100 UDP
Yes my busybox_httpd WEB-server is on port 8080. 192.168.1.200 do not exist on my lan so from the WAN the ports is stelth. 192.168.1.100 is my Sipura (VoIP box).
Is this solution OK?
PS I was not able to make the "post-firewall" approach working.
Have you given execute rights to the post-firewall file (chmod +x post-firewall) ?Originally Posted by FIB
Does the text of the post-firewall file begin with #!/bin/sh ? (is necessary!)
Yes and yes. At the end I managed to be unable communicate with the router if I attached the WAN cable!?! So I more or less gave up the post-firewall approach. Then I tried the GUI approach.Originally Posted by kdudl
i have a pb with the Web server on WAN.
on LAN, it works, but from Internet, i dan't have access to the Web page
i have the same pb with telnet, i can access from LAN, but not from WAN, and i have open ports on VIRTUAL NAT
I've resolved my pb with the Web Seerveur : i've forgotten a line in post-firewall !
but, i've always the pb with the telnet access from WAN