For me, it is no problem of having no IPv6 firewall at the WL-500gx level. (In my view, network security should be applied to the network peer level, not the network router level.) (If IPv6, which is...
Type: Posts; User: medium.net
For me, it is no problem of having no IPv6 firewall at the WL-500gx level. (In my view, network security should be applied to the network peer level, not the network router level.) (If IPv6, which is...
Hello Oleg,
I'm a happy user of your firmware. It is great that your firmware supports IPv6 (since 1.9.2.7-4). However, there does not seem to be IPv6 support regarding the PPP daemon.
My ISP...
Why not, when also doing as the supplied instructions do suggest?
With this patch, your PPPoE DSL modem may even reside at the WLAN side of the bridge, not only at the LAN side. Both ethernet...
This is the correct patch for 1.9.2.7-4, the former patch was for 1.9.2.7-2.
------ rc/network_ex.c 2005-04-01 04:33:02.000000000 +0200
+++ ../gateway.1.9.2.7-4.changed/rc/network_ex.c ...
Hello,
WL-300g users might have the problem that their sole LAN port might be either used as IP-over-Ethernet port or as Internet-Access-over-Ethernet port (i.e. PPPoE port), but not both.
If...