Fastest / least laggy FW?
I have been trying out the different FW through the 1.5 years.
After failing with BT several times i bought a separate NAS (Dlink DNS-323) that works like a charm in comparison.
SO NOW:
- I am looking for the FW that gives me the best wireless transfer speeds with WPA2 (and I guess AES encryption - since TKIP seems laggy as h.ll with huge dropouts in transfer rates)
Havent tried FW:
- 2.0.0.1 - any better?
- 2.0.0.6 with korean 40MHz? - does that mean more channels open up? If yes that would be helpful to get away from my interfering neightbours that are mostly between channel 1-9.
Would also like to be on the 5GHz band after reading this at Wikipedia:
"To achieve maximum throughput a pure 802.11n 5 GHz network is recommended. The 5 GHz band has substantial capacity due to many non-overlapping radio channels and less radio interference as compared to the 2.4 GHz band"
Is the ASUS WL-500W Bandwith option:
- "Wireless N only" option = 5GHz band
- "Auto" = 2.4 or 5GHz band depending on if i have G,B clients connecting?
The popup help text in FW 1.9.8.9 still seems old and unclear - some seem to reside from the old Wireless G-router
I have Wireless G that i can use for PS3 built into my ADSL modem/router, so no problem to get connection to G separate. The problem is how to access my NAS that is on the Asus wired port - guess i could uplink it though.
Any ideas on FW and clarification of Asus strange naming convention on their "user friendly" names in the WL-5000W :)
Regards
Boogieman
But at least final N upgrade is free
According to when i bought the routher they guaranteed the upgrade to final N for free, when it was finalized.
So I hope to see the final version being released soon.
Have asked cust supp and they said it should be up as after final specs are released.
Though I belevie we have to wait until October when the final N spec is publiced
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11n-2009
Hope the throughput and the dodgy behaviour is fixed then.
Now I only have to see if the WL-160N adapter works just as fine.
Had a WL-160W before but got it replaced on warranty and instead got the msaller 160N. I beleive that it is probalby not as effective, but hopefully it is more stable than the 160W.
A pity they dont supprt 5GHz. I understood it as though they had both bands built in but you could only be active at one at a time. Odd...
Regards
Boogieman