Thanks lly.Quote:
Originally Posted by lly
My bad I should have looked harder. looks like lots of new patches to the system.
Printable View
Thanks lly.Quote:
Originally Posted by lly
My bad I should have looked harder. looks like lots of new patches to the system.
It is not our module, no documentation :( Seems to be, meta is not checked.Quote:
Originally Posted by wpte
I am running bitcomet and it tells me that the upnp device cannot be found. How to resolve?
check for upnp is runningQuote:
Originally Posted by weixing
Code:ps | grep upnp
it's running!Quote:
Originally Posted by theMIROn
141 admin 1992 S upnp -D -L br0 -W ppp0
but just bitcomet cannot detect a upnp device is present. Any solutions?
I used bitcomet a while, and it might not have all the right standards I think:p
utorrent has no problem portforwarding, since it uses the windows api for upnp portforwarding.
just like this program: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/IP/PortForward.aspx
also I noticed that programs like limewire, xfire and world of warcraft work perfectly fine.:p
I just update lighttpd and noticed it wouldn't start anymore...
after entering debug mode:
epoll is something that should be included in the kernel as far as I know... and it has been the standard option for lighttpd since a long time:confused:Quote:
lighttpd -D -f /opt/etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf
fdevent_linux_sysepoll.c.131: epoll_create failed (Function not implemented), try to set server.event-handler = "poll" or "select"
fdevent.c.47: event-handler linux-sysepoll failed, try to set server.event-handler = "poll" or "select"
is there going to be epoll support or is this another bad compilation?:p
To use epoll program has to be compiled with our toolchain, since standard headers for 2.4 doesn't include epoll syscalls.Quote:
Originally Posted by wpte
looks like optware guys should turn off epoll usage wiithin lighttpd's mkfile and/or apply some patch.
I seriously don't get why so many packages change constantly without the same settings:pQuote:
Originally Posted by theMIROn
ah well... it's fixed now I guess.
Any chance of ipv6 coming back? according to libc http://wl500g.info/showthread.php?t=21119 it works on 1.9.2.7-10.
I know I'm a bit nagging atm:o
According to Issue 50 it works "As Is" but we are unable to check this.Quote:
Originally Posted by wpte
So, you can test IPv6 at any moment ;) , but unfortunately we can't help you
I'll go and compile it myself then:pQuote:
Originally Posted by lly
in 750 days ipv4 will be exhausted! http://www.inetcore.com/project/ipv4ec/index_en.html :eek::p
It will be excellent for all people, since you have experience :) and brain :pQuote:
Originally Posted by wpte
lol thnx:pQuote:
Originally Posted by lly
what distro do you actually use?
I've always used ubuntu desktop, since it builds everything quite nicely and easy (I like easy):p
It doesn't matter in case you have full development suite installed. I use OpenSuSe 11.1.Quote:
Originally Posted by wpte
I was just going to use the build in ftp server again with additional users.
now for what I remember and see when I look at my last configuration is that the user account list have their own directories in the Private Directory.
but now all accounts end up at the public directory:p
is there still a way to give the accounts their own directory?:p
Can you provide some more details how did you achieve this? By PM or just here.Quote:
Originally Posted by wpte
I've got builtin vsftpd working more then a year, private accounts are placed in /etc/vsftpd.users (/tmp/etc/vsftpd.users) as usual.Quote:
Originally Posted by wpte
We need steps to reproduce it, do you have "/" chars in user names or what?
no I have just standard names, no dodgy characters;)
I've just set it up in the webadmin
I just used the same configuration as when I still used oleg v10, I've never changed the ftp dirs since... in fact I didn't really used any ftp on the d firmware:p
what I recalled doing is setting the directories:
create the folders manually on the harddrive including the user folders inside the pvt directory.Quote:
Public Directory: /mnt/FTP/pub/
Private Directory: /mnt/FTP/pvt/
Anonymous Directory: /mnt/FTP/anonymous/
then just create the user accounts with passwords in the list and hit finish:)
When I'd log in with lets say "wpte" I would end up in the folder "/mnt/FTP/pvt/wpte". But in the ftp client it would look like it was the lowest directory.
now every account ends up in /mnt/FTP/pub/:(
Did you create "wpte" account from web-UI? What rights is it have? Please provide contents ofQuote:
Originally Posted by wpte
- /etc/vsftpd.conf
- /etc/vsftpd.passwd - don't forget to strip out passwords!
- /etc/vsftpd.users/wpte
P.S. It works for me too
wpte has all rightsQuote:
Originally Posted by lly
Quote:
cat /etc/vsftpd.conf
anonymous_enable=no
dirmessage_enable=yes
download_enable=no
dirlist_enable=no
hide_ids=yes
syslog_enable=yes
local_enable=yes
local_umask=022
chmod_enable=no
chroot_local_user=yes
check_shell=no
user_config_dir=/etc/vsftpd.users
passwd_file=/etc/vsftpd.passwd
listen=yes
listen_port=21
background=yes
max_clients=0
idle_session_timeout=0
utf8=yes
use_sendfile=no
anon_max_rate=0
local_max_rate=0
Quote:
cat /etc/vsftpd.passwd
ftp:x:0:0:ftp:/mnt/FTP/anonymous:/sbin/nologin
nobody:x:99:99:nobody:/usr/share/empty:/sbin/nologin
wpte:x:0:0:wouter:/mnt/FTP/pub:/sbin/nologin
Quote:
cat /etc/vsftpd.users/wpte
dirlist_enable=yes
download_enable=yes
write_enable=yes
Seems like some explanation neededQuote:
Originally Posted by wpte
To make user be within private_dir/username you have to set his rights to "Private", any other rights set means public_dir/ will be used for authorized users.
That's all, folks
haha, I overlooked that one:oQuote:
Originally Posted by theMIROn
works great
hey Guys.. I am currently on the original oleg firmware 1.9.2.7-10. If I upgrade to this latest one, is the only thing that I need to worry about is preserving my startup and rc scripts, right? All the things installed on my USB HDD don't need to worry about it?
So, my plan is to save my scripts, flash with the new firmware, put back old scripts, connect back the harddisk and reboot.. it should be fine?
yes, shouldn't be a problem!Quote:
Originally Posted by shantanugoel
you might want to reconfigure the webadmin again tho, it has some new features;)
thnx wpte.. whenever i post a question here, you are the one to answer :) I'll try it out. and hope that can help out in some possible ways :)Quote:
Originally Posted by wpte
Can someone please post here or on Googlecode, the differences/benefits of this new version, compared to 1.9.2.7-10 ?
I just replaced my HDD, and installed all from the beginning following wengi's great tutorial.
Can I upgrade only the Asus firmware and still continue using my new /opt and all ipkg installed packages ?
Thanks
Max
yes you can still use the ipkg packages, since they use their own uclibc library.Quote:
Originally Posted by QMax
benefits:
better security (ssh and ftp brute force attack blockers)
better compatebility
newer drivers
updates on a lot of things
better speed
etc.
:p
Hi, i still using the old OLEG firmware (pre10 version), i've tried 2 times the "new" firmware from http://code.google.com/p/wl500g and i found some issues in iptables, some rules were not applied, some other were (oleg OLEG version worked fine) but that was along time ago. So i decided today to install the R740 version that was available to download and the first thing i noticed was that the web enviroment its constantly failing "web page not found" when i travel over the web interface menus it shows many time that message, i've tried another computer and the same happen, i've used again the old OLEG version and it's all working fine, so i gave up from the new fw version again :(
Update: With Mozilla Firefox all works fine, with IE8 shows the "web page error", but with old OLEG it doesn't? Any explanation for this? Anyone noticed the same?
Didn't you forget about browser cache clearing?Quote:
Originally Posted by hggomes
iptables was upgraded, as you can read in NEWS. So, syntax may be changed and you should check this.Quote:
Originally Posted by hggomes
Anyway, some bugs can be present in new iptables too. Unless you provide details, nobody can say something useful.
Hi, offcourse not, i've tried that and even better. I've used IE8 from other machine and the same happen, but only with your fw version. I can't understand why. Can you test it with IE8 please? Browse all menus please.Quote:
Originally Posted by theMIROn
Hi, thanks for the answer but i was talking about the old version, i haven't test it now with de new one, i will soon ;) I just want to resolve the web browsing "problem" first, its really annoying :(Quote:
Originally Posted by lly
Sorry, I haven't IE at all and even don't want to install it under wine. Try any reliable browser (Opera, Firefox, Chrome, ...)Quote:
Originally Posted by hggomes
I tested all the pages with IE8 32bit and 64bit both worked fine, every page loads up, some a bit slow but they load.Quote:
Originally Posted by hggomes
probably a IE thing that happens over time since I rarely use IE.
looks like th RT-N16 firmware is almoast ready?:eek:
http://code.google.com/p/wl500g/source/list
I mean... rapid changes on the changes list:p
Unfortunately, it is not usable for end-users yet :( Too many TODO's and manual corrections after startup.Quote:
Originally Posted by wpte
About rapid changes - it was preparation for branches merge. We switch from patches to full source for some packages (httpd, rc)
ah well, it does sound a bit closer to completion.Quote:
Originally Posted by lly
I just hope the wifi signal is better than from dd-wrt, the only way to stop the package errors a bit is turning down the signal to 20mW... now it's 1/3 of the power comprared to my wl-500w:p
I'd say keep the good work up, and if there is anything to test I'd be happy to do so;)
It is not a big secret now, that DD-WRT team got somewhere broadcom wl sources (not last version, but complete bundle). Probably, they sign NDA with Broadcom.Quote:
Originally Posted by wpte
We tied to binaries from ASUS, I can't guarantee that they will much better :(
imo the original asus fw binaries perform better than the dd-wrt ones, so I guess it'll be fine;)Quote:
Originally Posted by lly