At this moment, you have to compile webcam driver yourself.
P.S. If someone help us with this task (tests and maybe additional patches), it will be much faster...
Printable View
I'm always up for beta testing:)
btw, what drivers would you propose?
still stick to the good old pwc and OV511 drivers?
http://www.saillard.org/linux/pwc/
http://ovcam.org/ov511/
I mean there are some other drivers out that support more and are designed for kernel 2.6
V4L2 kernel module is included in the extra modules already (v4l2-common.ko) as far as I can see, so that's the first step:p
Now the webcam drivers are all a bit old, latest updates from 2006 or so...
but our kernel is a bit old as well :p
Modern distro's usually use the UVC driver (http://www.ideasonboard.org/uvc/)
but it seems that it's unusable because it doesn't support still imaging on which the current webcam setup is based if I'm correct:p
yet, it supports an impressive list of devices
so... I'm unsure: change the webcam page with the UVC driver or use the good ol' drivers :p
ov511 drivers need some extra twi/i2c kernel modules for 2.6 apparently
I have noticed a problem with the strength/range of the wireless signal.
As soon as I install Oleg Firmware the wireless range become very limited!!!
With Oleg Firmware (RT-N16-1.9.2.7-rtn-r1639) the wireless signal is only good in the same room - but with Asus Firmware (1.0.1.2) I have strong signal everywhere in my house.
Just to confirm the settings:
This is with Asus firmware 1.0.1.2:
# nvram show | grep power
size: 18028 bytes (14740 left)
wl0_radio_power_x=17
wl_radio_power_x=17
And this Oleg:
nvram show | grep power
size: 14159 bytes (18609 left)
wl0_radio_power_x=19
wl_radio_power_x=19
Everything is default values (factory default after installed).
I have tried other values (30, 50 and even 84) but no big difference!
Is there something wrong with how Oleg handles the three antennas on the N16 - since stock Asus 1.0.1.2 has strong signal and Oleg VERY weak?
I´ve also tried Asus 1.0.1.6 (found on their FTP) and this was ALSO weak signal!
Can somebody check and confirm this?
check signal and other ssids with this
http://www.metageek.net/products/inssider
feel free to post screenshoots here then
Below are the screenshots. Notice that Asus signal strength is better (-70dBm). Oleg is almost unusable (-85dBm) - even though "radio power" is 19 in oleg but only 17 in asus! Why:confused:
Here´s asus 1.0.1.2 (I´m "WATERGATE"):
Signal strength ~ -70dBm
http://lh3.ggpht.com/_3jWLaYnz7tw/TF...2/asus1012.jpg
And here´s RT-N16-1.9.2.7-rtn-r1867:
Signal strength ~-85dBm!!!:confused:
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_3jWLaYnz7tw/TF...-rtn-r1867.jpg
Here come some poor observations and surggestions from a noob. :)
I see that asus 1.0.1.2 has a speed of 65 and the RT-N16-1.9.2.7-rtn-r1867 a speed of 54.
Is this due to the difference in signal strength?
Have you tried to measure the strength with another computer/network card?
1. Don´t think so - Oleg was configured G only. Maybe that´s it - cause I tested again with asus 1.0.1.2 also G only and then it measured 54. Still stronger signal though!
2. Yes - tested with another laptop (different brand) AND my PS3. Same result...
Best would be if someone could install 1.0.1.2 and confirm if they also get stronger signal....
speed is the (maximum) basic rate measured if I'm correct...
I'm wondering though... why G only?
if you set wireless mode to auto everything is supported :rolleyes:
Here I can still use internet at 50m distance trough trees and walls.
moreover, turning the wifi power up doesn't necessarily increase the network strength
The last command in the "wl help" looks very interesting:
If that value is set to 0 (SISO=single input/single output) then RT-n16 would use only one antenna, right?Quote:
mimo_ss_stf
g/set SS STF mode.
Usage: wl mimo_ss_stf <value> <-b a | b>
value: 0 - SISO; 1 - CDD
-b(band): a - 5G; b - 2.4G
Am I the only one with weak wireless signal (with Oleg firmware - Asus stock is normal)???