what aboutUsing uclibc-opt is cruical for proper operation of all packages. I would recomment reinstalling dependent packages.Code:export TERM=vt100
nano
Printable View
what aboutUsing uclibc-opt is cruical for proper operation of all packages. I would recomment reinstalling dependent packages.Code:export TERM=vt100
nano
I just get ..
[admin@Asus root]$ export TERM=vt100
[admin@Asus root]$ nano
Error opening terminal: vt100.
What packages is the depending ones? As i said in the previous post i can figure out some of them but not all .. sorry if i'm a complete noob but we all should learn sometime :)
Does it matter in wich order the packages is installed?
I would try installing termcap. Mine nano works.
Code:ipkg info nano
What version do you use?Quote:
Originally Posted by oleo
i have different image and no links
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/2369/transfersr7.png
By the way - Transmission 0.90 Released! Posted by John Clay on 24/10/07
When will be it available from repository?
I have removed links. They were only distracting.
I have tested some version in between 0.82 and 0.9 and I must stay that backend really had some changes that I am unhappy with. Namely libevent instead of threads. 0.9 will be tested and then released as ipkg.
i believe that you know better about libevent and threads :)Quote:
Originally Posted by oleo
i'll wait impatiently
transmission_0.93+r3834-1_mipsel.ipk is now available.
With introdution of 0.9x libtransmission library many changes happened.
Most notable is new developer, that brought new ideas such as libevent
instead of threads, encryption support, PEX, ban peers, ..., and new bugs.
2GB single file limit, scrape problems, etc are now solved. Please report your findings here.
So beware before upgrading from 0.82 and prior to 0.93 and later. COMPLETE
YOUR DOWNLOADS BEFORE UPGRADING OR YOU WILL LOSE DATA!
could be possible to add a button for upload a file in "source" folder, directly from pc? Just like torrential or sctcs.
transmission 0.93 consumes lot of memory, maybe too much for router.
Can someone confirm?
regards
I've also noticed that. But my router has 64MB ant this seems not to be a problem.
Didn't notice that. Eating less than 10M.Quote:
Originally Posted by oleo
But in 0.82 I had about 10 multithreaded processes and only 3 process threads now.
But I have problem with upload rate when downloading. Even when download rate is limited.
http://wl500g.info/attachment.php?at...1&d=1195550265
This is normal. Transmission shows only good packets. There is a lot of handshakinkg needed for peer communication when downloading from may peers.Quote:
Originally Posted by zheka_ppp
Hello,
im also owner of WL-500gp and installed latest transmission and found out that d/u is slow. So i check on forum and they found a problem in client but is already fix in build 3846.
http://transmission.m0k.org/forum/vi...ht=slow+upload
please make new transmission build to make us happy :D
Enabling swap should eliminate memory space problems. You should enable swap anyway, just in case. rtorrent for example also goes over 32 MB when hashing or navigating torrent info and will crash without swap enabled.
Done in Changeset #7326Quote:
Originally Posted by polde