Bekijk de volledige versie : Firmware v1.9.2.7 CR5, updated: v1.9.2.7 CR5a [Oleg]
Well, there was some delay in the releasing this firmware version. I wa a bit busy with various stuff and finally I've tried to made it stable. So, here it goes. Ethernet port related crashes, which was since 1.9.2.7 should go away (wl500g only), also wireless module was updated to the latest from the 1.9.3.6 beta, which seems fixes some glitches found in the 1.9.2.7 firmwares.
Changes:
Used wireless module from the 1.9.3.6 beta, should improve stability
Rewrote ethernet driver "WAN port dies workaround" completely. This should fix random reboots caused by 1.9.2.7 firmwares
Fixed ppp never ending loop, caused by pressing Disconnect button
Connect and Disconnect button should work better now in the PPTP/PPPoE mode
Removed never ending ping done by firmware, notifying guys from Taiwan of your router, then you press Connect
Updated PPTP client to 1.6.0
Fixed "Idle 0" as well as probably other settings in the web interface which are allowing 0 to be specified
Add usb serial support to the kernel, included an updated pl2303 version (thanks to Rod Whitby for porting this to the current kernel)
Added chat ppp program
USB services are get started now even if NFS only is enabled (thanks to Rod Whitby for figuring this out)
Finally, WAN Hostname no longer prevents samba from working
WL500g Deluxe now supports MAC cloning
WL500g Deluxe with an updated bootloader now correctly enables WAN port in the AP mode
ASUS test program is no longer installed, so busybox version is now used
ipkg.sh should now correctly create /opt/tmp/ipkg
NFS max block size is now 32K (use with care)
Added codepages 860, 861, 865, 866, 869, cp1250, cp1251 (use usb_vfat_options to pass additional mount flags to mount)
Old upnp entries should not have any effect then upnp is disabled
Added new network type - MAN on the static routes page, should be used with PPTP/PPPoE connections to access internal networks
Changed maximum number of routes - 16 vs 6
Fixed a PATH problem in the telnet sessions
RAW printing is now bidirectional (used p910nd 0.7)
Afterburner setting is now accessible on the wl300g/wl500g/wlhdd units (enabled for the supported devices only). You still need to enable it in the hardware by executing wlan_update once in the telnet session/hidden page, this should also fix "range" problem
Added System Command page, which is well known as Hidden Admin Page
Added support for system shutdown - press RESTORE/RESET button until power led turns off completely and release it, your unit should go "down" in several seconds. Use halt from the command line to do the same.
Replaced /usr/local/sbin/ip-ip and ip-down with ip-up-script/ip-down-script ppp options
Added /usr/local/sbin/pre-shutdown script support - called before reboot/halt
Other usefull things
Uploaded updated firmware 1.9.2.7-5a, the changes are:
Fixed RAW printing bugs, switched to unidirectional transfers by default
Fixed support for the WPA-PSK in the Client Mode, thanks to miraculix for findings
Fixed ftp server bug, which prevented files to be uploaded to subdirectories
CET Timezone update by engy, added Czech Republic
Increased number of entries on the Bandwidth page up to 32, patch from engy
Added awk applet, applied mktime patch from engy
Applied timezones uClibc patch prepared by engy
Applied tomilius patches adding several new iptables targets
Updated WL500g Deluxe to use latest ethernet module, removed closed source binaries
Grab (http://files.wl500g.info/asus/custom/oleg/1.9.2.7-5a/) your free copy of new firmware, unzip it and flash to your router. As usual, be sure to visit my page (http://oleg.wl500g.info/) if you've not done this yet.
Ah, great update! it looks like the problems i was having with -4 are now fixed.
Thank you so much.
What is the sequence between shutdown and reset settings? Can it be altered with the pre-shutdown script?
Thanks for this update Oleg.
tomilius
05-05-2005, 23:24
Yes, it's nice :). I have a slightly unrelated suggestion.. With the source, using "make clean" is really a pain because it fails. A couple of simple changes can stop it from having errors and make it work correctly, and it would be nice if they were included in the next source patch (so simple, please throw this in :D).
cleanfix.patch:
diff -Naur gateway-old/etherwake/Makefile gateway/etherwake/Makefile
--- gateway-old/etherwake/Makefile 2005-05-05 22:20:12.890000000 +0000
+++ gateway/etherwake/Makefile 2005-05-05 22:19:22.880000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o ether-wake ether-wake.c
clean:
- rm ether-wake
+ rm -f ether-wake
install:
$(INSTALL) ether-wake $(DESTDIR)/usr/sbin
diff -Naur gateway-old/upnp/Makefile gateway/upnp/Makefile
--- gateway-old/upnp/Makefile 2005-05-05 22:20:04.660000000 +0000
+++ gateway/upnp/Makefile 2005-05-05 22:19:43.000000000 +0000
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
clean:
$(MAKE) -C $(UPNP) clean
- rm -f upnp
+ rm -f $(UPNP)/upnp
upnp: FORCE
$(MAKE) -C $(UPNP) DEBUG=$(DEBUG) SRCBASE=$(SRCBASE) TOP=$(TOP) TARGET_PREFIX=$(CROSS_COMPILE)
Thanks oleg!
I realy appreciate being able to use latest intel wi-fi driver (9.x) for my centrino. It seems to be stable with your CR5 release!
One question:
What is this message that I have in system log:
May 6 00:32:53 kernel: et1: rx stuck suspected
First time that I see these one... without changing any config!
Antiloop
06-05-2005, 00:15
Thanks oleg!
I realy appreciate being able to use latest intel wi-fi driver (9.x) for my centrino. It seems to be stable with your CR5 release!
One question:
What is this message that I have in system log:
May 6 00:32:53 kernel: et1: rx stuck suspected
First time that I see these one... without changing any config!
I've noticed this as well
but et1 is the WAN port so most logical is that this is a message that it 'recovered' the WAN port from dying
I've noticed this as well
but et1 is the WAN port so most logical is that this is a message that it 'recovered' the WAN port from dying
So... nothing to do with possible bad cable type on wan port?
Thanks oleg!
I realy appreciate being able to use latest intel wi-fi driver (9.x) for my centrino. It seems to be stable with your CR5 release!
One question:
What is this message that I have in system log:
May 6 00:32:53 kernel: et1: rx stuck suspected
First time that I see these one... without changing any config!
Yes, this is WAN port dies workaround. It just get activated, but it does not mean, that you've any problems. As log says "suspected" - there is no reliable way to determine this. Anyway, I will remove this output (thought that I've done this).
What is the sequence between shutdown and reset settings? Can it be altered with the pre-shutdown script?
pre-shutdown is get called after decision has been made.
As for sequence.
Then you initially press button, there is a 3 second delay before anything gets activated. Once this 3 seconds interval elapses, the power led should start blinking for 5 seconds indicating, that restore to defaults would occur if you release the button. Once this 5 seconds interval elapses, power led will turn off for 5 seconds completely indicating, that it you release the button the device would go down. If you did not release a button, the things will start over - i.e. 3 seconds of nothing, then 5 seconds restore, then 5 seconds down, etc.
Jean-Fabrice
06-05-2005, 08:08
lzma.zip seems to contains the dos .exe version of lzma api.
Is this ok ?
Yes, it's nice :). I have a slightly unrelated suggestion.. With the source, using "make clean" is really a pain because it fails. A couple of simple changes can stop it from having errors and make it work correctly, and it would be nice if they were included in the next source patch (so simple, please throw this in :D).
Ok, will do.
jojobach
06-05-2005, 12:08
I'm a bit confused. Is this version 1.9.2.7 the same as the one downloadable in asus site? The version number is the same...
tomilius
06-05-2005, 12:13
It's custom firmware based off of ASUS' GPL source for 1.9.2.7. It's the 5th custom revision (CR5).
I'm a bit confused. Is this version 1.9.2.7 the same as the one downloadable in asus site? The version number is the same...
you put the wrong file... :)
if you put this file, that are show to download you see in
System Setup -> Firmware Upgrade
Firmware Release: 1.9.2.7-5
will this firmware work with 2 bridged 500g in WDS using WPA?
emilyaoo
06-05-2005, 17:45
I found something interest...
when I upgrade to this new version firmware..
I thought I should reset all data configration...
But after I push the buttom after 5 seconds then turn off my AP
When I turn on it again...the Page has not asked me to set all new data
and the data also there...just like I have not upgrade it...
So?...what's problem with the reset buttom?
Hi Oleg,
just a great work! Thanks from Germany
rolano :)
Jean-Fabrice
06-05-2005, 18:45
is my build system broken or are there strange behaviour in the new firmware source ?
1) I noticed that lzma.zip contains a dos exe (lzma.exe). Should my unzip be capable handling it ? Because I find it not to be
2) I did not remember previous firmware to depends on ncurses for building. In this one, 'make oldconfig' called by main Makefile at some stage do some stuff that finally broke, asking for ncurses devel + libs.
3) I have some trouble at the wl.o extracting stage. wl.o file created appears to be 0 bytes while the original .gz one has been extracted at its original place. *strange*
Any idea ?
is my build system broken or are there strange behaviour in the new firmware source ?
1) I noticed that lzma.zip contains a dos exe (lzma.exe). Should my unzip be capable handling it ? Because I find it not to be
yes, unzip handles this nicely.
2) I did not remember previous firmware to depends on ncurses for building. In this one, 'make oldconfig' called by main Makefile at some stage do some stuff that finally broke, asking for ncurses devel + libs.
this is from the begining - ncurses are needed for make menuconfig, which is get called for both firmware and kernel.
3) I have some trouble at the wl.o extracting stage. wl.o file created appears to be 0 bytes while the original .gz one has been extracted at its original place. *strange*
works fine for me too. Your gunzip does not understand -c option as seems, does it really old?
I found something interest...
when I upgrade to this new version firmware..
I thought I should reset all data configration...
But after I push the buttom after 5 seconds then turn off my AP
When I turn on it again...the Page has not asked me to set all new data
and the data also there...just like I have not upgrade it...
So?...what's problem with the reset buttom?
you should release button, then LED is blinking, not then it's off.
will this firmware work with 2 bridged 500g in WDS using WPA?
It should work, read 1.9.2.7 CR4 thread if it does not.
Will you release a fix for the: "et1: rx stuck suspected"? Or can I fix it my self? I get one every minute and it's clogging up my syslog..
B.
Will you release a fix for the: "et1: rx stuck suspected"? Or can I fix it my self? I get one every minute and it's clogging up my syslog..
B.
I've re-uploaded files to http://oleg.wl500g.info/1.9.2.7-5/
Antiloop, please update your mirror.
It should work, read 1.9.2.7 CR4 thread if it does not.
Unfortunately, It does not work. (in my case and with: 2 * WL-500g in AP mode, WDS and WPA-PSK / AES).
Here's what i did:
I had a working WDS setup with the ASUS 1.9.4.0 firmware and flashed both routers with 1.9.2.7-CR5 firmware, leaving the settings unchanged. After reboot; WDS NOt working.
Then flashed both routers back with 1.9.4.0, again leaving the settings unchanged. WDS is working now...
hi,
nfsserver with rsize/wsize=32768 is pretty fast, but after enable the NFS-Server, the log seems to stops after:
.
Jan 1 01:00:02 kernel: PDC20265: IDE controller on PCI bus 01 dev 08
Jan 1 01:00:02 kernel: PCI: Enabling device 01:01.0 (0004 -> 0007)
Jan 1 01:00:02 kernel: PDC20265: chipset revision 2
and the 'clear', 'save', 'refresh' button are no longer available...also after reset to factory default. If I disable NFS-Server, the log continuus and the buttons get visible again.
cu,
peter
PS:after enable/disable/enable the NFS-Server the buttons are back and the log works...I dont know why.
Antiloop
07-05-2005, 16:05
I've re-uploaded files to http://oleg.wl500g.info/1.9.2.7-5/
Antiloop, please update your mirror.
files updated
Changes:
...........
Added chat ppp program
...........
What is this and where can I find it?
Antiloop
08-05-2005, 01:19
What is this and where can I find it?
if you don't know what it is, you probably don't need and don't miss it
it's a chat program for PPP
Hi Guys,
I got trouble with my USB printer. It just print incomplete jobs. No problems on WL500g-1.9.2.7-4.trx.
From the System Log:
Jan 1 01:00:11 kernel: printer.c: usblp0 Device ID string [117/max 1552]='MFG:Canon;CMD:BJL,BJRaster3,BSCCe;SOJ:TXT01;MDL: i560;CLS:PRINTER;DES:Canon i560;VER:1.06;STA:10;POS:000000FFFFFFFF;'
Jan 1 01:00:11 kernel: printer.c: Parsing USBLPID...
..
May 8 10:38:13 kernel: printer.c: usblp0 Device ID string [117/max 1552]='MFG:Canon;CMD:BJL,BJRaster3,BSCCe;SOJ:TXT01;MDL: i560;CLS:PRINTER;DES:Canon i560;VER:1.06;STA:10;POS:000000FFFFFFFF;'
May 8 10:38:13 kernel: printer.c: Parsing USBLPID...
May 8 10:38:38 p9100d[69]: Connection from 192.168.1.72 port 1271 accepted
Btw. Samba is OK now.
Hi
I had two strange things:
Dieing PPPd ???
(Edit: Happened only once, but strange)
Jan 1 01:00:21 pppd[97]: Modem hangup
Jan 1 01:00:21 pppd[97]: Connection terminated.
Jan 1 01:00:21 pppd[97]: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
Jan 1 01:00:21 pppd[97]: Sent 808 bytes, received 254 bytes.
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 000000e8, epc == 800d1b18, ra == 800d1af0
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Oops in fault.c::do_page_fault, line 192:
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: $0 : 00000000 802048c4 00000001 00000039 807b4790 00000000 00000000 00000008
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: $8 : 00000039 00000071 00000010 7465398e 00005000 00000000 00004000 00000000
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: $16: 802147e8 80983180 807b4760 00000000 806ade98 7fff79c8 00000000 7fff7a80
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: $24: 00000010 2abd8120 806ac000 806ade58 7fff7b2a 800d1af0
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Hi : 00000000
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Lo : 0000000e
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: epc : 800d1b18 Not tainted
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Status: 1000fc03
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Cause : 00000008
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Process pppd (pid: 97, stackpage=806ac000)
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Stack: 0083869b 00000042 806ac000 80961840 7fff7e18 8029eaf8 0000001e
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: 00000003 7fff7ee4 7fff79c8 800ead94 800ead50 80bf6e90 800c58e0 800c5638
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: 00030002 00000018 00000000 411a9000 7465398e 07003168 8c282ac5 60002ac9
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: 800c1001 fffffff0 80ef9b80 806551e0 8027d2e0 8071b220 80037a44 809dec60
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: 80042c58 802af000 809dec60 806551e0 809f16e0 00000000 00000003 80035ebc
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: 80035ea8 ...
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Call Trace: [<800ead94>] [<800ead50>] [<800c58e0>] [<800c5638>] [<800c1001>]
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: [<80037a44>] [<80042c58>] [<80035ebc>] [<80035ea8>] [<800085a4>]
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel:
Jan 1 01:00:21 kernel: Code: 00000000 8e450024 24020001 <c0a400e8> 00821823 e0a300e8 1060fffc 00821823 0000000f
Jan 1 01:00:21 pppd[135]: Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.
Jan 1 01:00:21 pppd[135]: RP-PPPoE plugin version 3.3 compiled against pppd 2.4.2
Jan 1 01:00:21 pppd[136]: pppd 2.4.2 started by admin, uid 0
Terracam Pro (OV518) not Working, green Picture
May 8 12:41:14 USB webcam: webcam capture no frame (Repeating)
- Can you make LPR, Waveserver, Jetdirekt printing jobs and maybe infosvr disable over web interface ?
- The USB RS232 Modules are nice :)
Greets
Hi Guys,
I got trouble with my USB printer. It just print incomplete jobs. No problems on WL500g-1.9.2.7-4.trx.
From the System Log:
Jan 1 01:00:11 kernel: printer.c: usblp0 Device ID string [117/max 1552]='MFG:Canon;CMD:BJL,BJRaster3,BSCCe;SOJ:TXT01;MDL: i560;CLS:PRINTER;DES:Canon i560;VER:1.06;STA:10;POS:000000FFFFFFFF;'
Jan 1 01:00:11 kernel: printer.c: Parsing USBLPID...
..
May 8 10:38:13 kernel: printer.c: usblp0 Device ID string [117/max 1552]='MFG:Canon;CMD:BJL,BJRaster3,BSCCe;SOJ:TXT01;MDL: i560;CLS:PRINTER;DES:Canon i560;VER:1.06;STA:10;POS:000000FFFFFFFF;'
May 8 10:38:13 kernel: printer.c: Parsing USBLPID...
May 8 10:38:38 p9100d[69]: Connection from 192.168.1.72 port 1271 accepted
Btw. Samba is OK now.
Could you please try disabling "Bidirectional communications" in the printer properties of your windows box?
Terracam Pro (OV518) not Working, green Picture
May 8 12:41:14 USB webcam: webcam capture no frame (Repeating)
It should work, try repluging cam and rebooting router.
- Can you make LPR, Waveserver, Jetdirekt printing jobs and maybe infosvr disable over web interface ?
Probably.
Already done that - no change, sorry.
Already done that - no change, sorry.
btw, do you use RAW printing?
Yes, RAW port 9100
Start telnet/ssh session to router and type this:
killall p910nd
p910nd -f /dev/usb/lp0 0
And try printing again.
That makes me able to print again, great. Can I insert the codelines in post-boot to make it a permanent fix for me?
yes, sure. as seems drivers do not expect bidirectional communication, so printing hangs at some point.
I would like to know if anyone has any positive effect with bidirectional RAW printing. Otherwise I will remove it, as it only causes problems as seems.
Anyway, thanks for the trick - and firmware.
Old upnp entries should not have any effect then upnp is disabled
What is ment by this? Is this a fix for the bug where upnp ports are never closed?
BTW, Thanks for the good work!
BR, René
Antiloop
08-05-2005, 15:29
yes, sure. as seems drivers do not expect bidirectional communication, so printing hangs at some point.
I would like to know if anyone has any positive effect with bidirectional RAW printing. Otherwise I will remove it, as it only causes problems as seems.
I'm unable to test currently, hp lost my printer when repairing.. still waiting for a new one
What is ment by this? Is this a fix for the bug where upnp ports are never closed?
BTW, Thanks for the good work!
BR, René
Well, it disables using of old upnp rules if you've disabled upnp in the router.
I'm unable to test currently, hp lost my printer when repairing.. still waiting for a new one
With my hp dj 3420 I've seen bidir communications, but windows still does not report any usefull info, such as ink level...
It should work, try repluging cam and rebooting router.
Nope. Tried several times. Had this isue with R4 also, green picture but i think no syslog entrys. Just had no time to tell here.
The Cam worked on a x86 linux and windows box, so i am curious what the problem can be on 500g ...
Please, can you tell me what the wlan_update tool does, i started it acidentely (no --help parameter check ;)) and now have afterburner supported. I know it patches something in the chipset eeprom, is this possible harmfull and is it reversible ?
What does this mean it maybe fixes the range problem ?
One last, is the output of "free" meaningfull in any way ? Free mem value changes in a way that seems strange when loading and killing software.
Also samba is not working, deamons die without notice but i may have missed some configuration point.
Greets
Nice release after all.
Jean-Fabrice
08-05-2005, 17:32
With my hp dj 3420 I've seen bidir communications, but windows still does not report any usefull info, such as ink level...
Same for me with a Canon i865.
I have the same problems with my HP990cxi printer than FIB already described earlier:
Text is only printed partly (the first lines on a page and the last on another page).
I tried the fix given by Oleg:
killall p910nd
p910nd -f /dev/usb/lp0 0
But it has no positive effect for me (FIB has more luck!). I think the fix is directed only to USB printers (Is this correct Oleg?) and unfortunately I am using the parallell interface to connect the HP990cxi (the USB is used for the external disk).
Has Oleg also a fix for the parallell printer interface ?It would be great because CR4 was working very well with my printer (with RAW option), and otherwise CR5 seems to be a good improvement step. It would be a pity to have to go back to CR4 in order to be able to use the print server again. Thanks in advance for every help with this problem.
Additional Remark: Concerning the introduced bidirectional functionality of the interface in CR5: the information of the printer is not detected by my Windows XP Pro system and the HP990cxi drivers and utilities.
So I think that the new function is not useful at this state (for me, with my HP990cxi...).
Last remark: The work of the developers in this forum is great ! As a Linux newbie I am only able to be a very pleased user of this superb work. I appreciate very much !
But it has no positive effect for me (FIB has more luck!). I think the fix is directed only to USB printers (Is this correct Oleg?) and unfortunately I am using the parallell interface to connect the HP990cxi (the USB is used for the external disk).
Yes, for parallel port use
killall p910nd
p910nd -f /dev/printers/0 1
Nope. Tried several times. Had this isue with R4 also, green picture but i think no syslog entrys. Just had no time to tell here.
The Cam worked on a x86 linux and windows box, so i am curious what the problem can be on 500g ...
Have you tried both refresh and activex mode? Also, try 1.9.2.7-4a. There was no webcam changes in the -5.
Please, can you tell me what the wlan_update tool does, i started it acidentely (no --help parameter check ;)) and now have afterburner supported. I know it patches something in the chipset eeprom, is this possible harmfull and is it reversible ?
What does this mean it maybe fixes the range problem ?
The things are not harmfull. Yes, they're reversible, but there is no reason to reverse them. This is a code "prepared" by ASUS. And as seems, ASUS will call this automatically starting with 1.9.4.0. Anyway, there was two changes performed enabled Afterburner (does not have an effect if you've disabled it in the web interface) and changed maximum allowed output power for the wireless part.
One last, is the output of "free" meaningfull in any way ? Free mem value changes in a way that seems strange when loading and killing software.
free = free + shared + buffered
Yes, for parallel port use
killall p910nd
p910nd -f /dev/printers/0 1
Thank you Oleg, but sorry, I tried the fix unsuccessfully. It seems to work only with very short texts. For longer ones, the printer prints only one line and, after that, escapes the rest of the page and stops.
When i press FINISH and SAVE/RESTART buttons on web management page, WL-500g starts rebooting, power LED goes off, but it doesn't come back again. I have to replug power cord to get it works.
Afterburner setting is now accessible on the wl300g/wl500g/wlhdd units (enabled for the supported devices only). You still need to enable it in the hardware by executing wlan_update once in the telnet session/hidden page, this should also fix "range" problem
Please can somebody explain this?
Will it work with "ordinary" WL-500g?
And what "range" problem does it fix?
Thank you Oleg, but sorry, I tried the fix unsuccessfully. It seems to work only with very short texts. For longer ones, the printer prints only one line and, after that, escapes the rest of the page and stops.
It should work for sure. I've no idea why it does not work for you...
tomilius
09-05-2005, 09:01
It should work for sure. I've no idea why it does not work for you...
Welcome to the Dark Side of Linux. :rolleyes:
I have the same problems with my HP930c printer on the LPT port as FIB already described earlier:
Text is only printed partly (the first lines on a page and the last on another page). :(
On the USB port I use a Samsung ML1210 laserprinter without problems.
No print problems with V 1.9.2.7 3c
:)
I am using an HP880 printer, using the firmware V1.9.2.7 CR5 printing with LPT port some text/graphics are missing. (p9101d -f /dev/printers/0 1: i removed -B from the LPT printing deamon). I tried the USB port of the HP880 printer as well, this port seems to work ok.
I am using an HP880 printer, using the firmware V1.9.2.7 CR5 printing with LPT port some text/graphics are missing. (p9101d -f /dev/printers/0 1: i removed -B from the LPT printing deamon). I tried the USB port of the HP880 printer as well, this port seems to work ok.
Could you please post your system log, once job is printed? Try this with no -b.
Could you please post your system log, once job is printed? Try this with no -b.
Oleg
i included "syslog Hans.txt" file. (Printing a excel document to the HP880 using the LPT port). Printing the same document over the USB port to the same printer works ok.
nOBeLium
09-05-2005, 22:39
Just wanted to share my experience with the wireless module. I was having enormous problems with wireless - from very low range/power to continous disconnects. Upgraded to this new firmware 1.9.2.7-CR5 and activated afterburner succesfully - my wireless connection is finally working again. I now have a very large range, much better than with the 1.9.2.7-4 or even 1.8.1.7 firmwares, both custom. The connection hasn't dropped yet, and has been on for several hours so, stability has also improved. Haven't came across any other problem until now so I'm very satisfied with this new version.
Thanks for your work.
Regards,
It should work for sure. I've no idea why it does not work for you...
Status of the problem with a HP990cxi printer with parallell interface:
I have integrated the fix "killall p910nd and p910nd -f /dev/printers/0 1" in my post-boot file. After that I checked again thoroughfully the printing function.
My observations:
1) With the last version of the HP enhanced driver (version.4.3.3) the printer does not work correctly at all (same symptoms as described earlier by FIB, Fred, myself and others)
2) With the basic version of the driver (the one embedded in Windows XP) the printer works in some situations (f.i. printing of short mails) but not for complex pages (f.i. printer test page of windows, or using the booklet function of the well known fineprint print utility).
Concerning the introduced bidirectional functionality in CR5: the driver detects the availibility of the bidirectional feature. But the printing utilities are not able to use it.
I have downgraded my WL500g back to CR4. With this firmware the printing works (again!) like a charm.
I regret to make the step back to CR4 because the other functions of CR5 seem to work very well and are really more stable than CR4. But I really need the printserver function (it was for me an important argument to buy the Wl500g).
Question to Oleg: Is it possible to get a version of CR5 with the original printing functionality of CR4? In case of limited investment to produce this partial backstep I think it would be a reasonable compromise. Thank you in advance for every help in this direction.
do you've timeouts in the system log?
do you've timeouts in the system log?
First of all, you find as annex the syslog made with CR4 from boot up to time after a successful print.
In order to document the problem I have installed again CR5. You find as further annexes:
1) Syslog with CR5 without fix: from boot up to time after print of 2 documents (both documents unsuccessful)
2) Syslog with CR5 with fix : from boot up to time after print of 4 documents:
first doc: short doc printed with basic driver: successful
second doc: XP printer test page with basic driver: partly unsuccessful
third doc: short doc with HP driver: unsuccessful
fourth doc: XP printer test page with HP driver: unsuccessful
Would other infos be useful for you before i go back again to CR4 installation?
Ok, everyone with RAW print problems are invited to test this firmware: http://wl500g.dyndns.org/WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre1.trx and let me know if it starts working and other printing problems you probably have with RAW printing.
Ok, everyone with RAW print problems are invited to test this firmware: http://wl500g.dyndns.org/WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre1.trx and let me know if it starts working and other printing problems you probably have with RAW printing.Sorry, but WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre1.trx do not work for my, but different than WL500g-1.9.2.7-5.trx. Look like some missing/corrupted/extra chars are sent to the printer. I just do the "Print Test Page" in Windows XP, so I can't provide further details, sorry.
FIB, it should work for you, as I've removed -b. Please try with trick again (should not help if you've flashed right firmware).
Ok, everyone with RAW print problems are invited to test this firmware: http://wl500g.dyndns.org/WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre1.trx and let me know if it starts working and other printing problems you probably have with RAW printing.
Hello Oleg, Thanks for your efforts to solve our printer problems.
I have installed the 5a-pre1 version.
In my case I register unfortunately no progress. In raw modus the printer does not print anything more correctly. Same situation with the basic driver or with the HP driver.
As I need to use the print server, I tried to switch to the LPR modus. The result is positive. The printer is working correctly. (I don't know if it was also the case with the original CR5 version; I did not test it earlier). So at this time I will stay with your last version and print with the LPR modus. In waiting and hope that a solution is once available for the RAW modus. I will also inform you if the other functions of 5a-pre1 are workink correctly.
Ok, everyone with RAW print problems are invited to test this firmware: http://wl500g.dyndns.org/WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre1.trx and let me know if it starts working and other printing problems you probably have with RAW printing.
Hi Oleg
I try the firmware, and the printer (hp890), print all the text, and a lot of other characters, my canon printer (Pixma4000), connected to the usb port, can't print at all.
With the firmware 1.9.2.7-5, the Canon printer, prints one good print, than I have to reboot, to get the printer work again.
If I after a reboot print one one the HP printer, then I can't print one the canon after this
Sorry for my english.
/Emand
FIB, it should work for you, as I've removed -b. Please try with trick again (should not help if you've flashed right firmware). The trick:
killall p910nd
p910nd -f /dev/usb/lp0 0
do not do any difference on (my ;) ) WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre1.trx.
I need a system logs from unsuccessful printings. Please post them.
I need a system logs from unsuccessful printings. Please post them.From WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre1.trx no trick.
I need a system logs from unsuccessful printings. Please post them.
Hi Oleg,
In the attachment the needed syslog (from boot time up to unsuccessful printing in RAW.
I need a system logs from unsuccessful printings. Please post them.
I have maked a save in the syslog windows in the web interface, im not sure that this is log file you mean.
(5a-Pre1)
/Emand
I need a system logs from unsuccessful printings. Please post them.
Oleg,
I put your new firmware in the wl-500g. (5a-pre1)
Printing to my parallel port got worse, printing the same exel file as yesterday, gives a lot of corrupted text/pages.
thanks for your effort.
Hans
Hi Oleg,
In the attachment the needed syslog (from boot time up to unsuccessful printing in RAW.
Sorry, attachment was missing...
Guys, yet another attempt. Fixed a stupid error in -pre1, do not use it anymore. Try this one (http://wl500g.dyndns.org/WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre2.trx) and let me know if you are happy now. :)
Guys, yet another attempt. Fixed a stupid error in -pre1, do not use it anymore. Try this one (http://wl500g.dyndns.org/WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre2.trx) and let me know if you are happy now. :)
It seems that both of my printers are working all right now.
Thanks
/Emand
Guys, yet another attempt. Fixed a stupid error in -pre1, do not use it anymore. Try this one (http://wl500g.dyndns.org/WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre2.trx) and let me know if you are happy now. :)
Oleg,
The excel sheet now prints OK, in the syslog however there is still:
May 10 23:26:53 kernel: lp_wait_ready timeout
May 10 23:26:53 kernel: lp_write timeout
should these messages be there?
Tomorrow i will trie some more prints.
Thanks.
Oleg,
The excel sheet now prints OK, in the syslog however there is still:
May 10 23:26:53 kernel: lp_wait_ready timeout
May 10 23:26:53 kernel: lp_write timeout
should these messages be there?
Tomorrow i will trie some more prints.
Thanks.
Try printing other documents. The messages above just indicating that your printer is busy, but this should not cause any problems. Most likely you had these messages with 1.9.2.7-4 too...
Guys, yet another attempt. Fixed a stupid error in -pre1, do not use it anymore. Try this one (http://wl500g.dyndns.org/WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre2.trx) and let me know if you are happy now. :)
Hi, Oleg
Good news, this morning
My HP990cxi is functioning again very well in RAW mode and this with the last version of the enhanced driver of HP.
Concerning the bidirectional functionality: the driver shows the possibility to activate the function, but the printer utility cannot use it (no indication of the ink level).
Guys, yet another attempt. Fixed a stupid error in -pre1, do not use it anymore. Try this one (http://wl500g.dyndns.org/WL500g-1.9.2.7-5a-pre2.trx) and let me know if you are happy now. :)Works for me. Thanks for your help.
Please can somebody explain this?
Will it work with "ordinary" WL-500g?
And what "range" problem does it fix?
I have also wondered about that. I have just recently bought my 2nd WL-500g, and it will be upgraded to this new firmware very shortly.
Will I get better range if i commit this "upgrade" on my WL-500g? I have some problmes with the range one floor down. One floor up is no problem. But that may be because of that the ground floor consists of very much concrete, and my 2nd floor consists of wood... I don't know.
But will I get better range by doing this? And how do I do it? I have already set the TX power to 84 mW.
Thanks. And thanks for a super firmware!!!
I have also wondered about that. I have just recently bought my 2nd WL-500g, and it will be upgraded to this new firmware very shortly.
Will I get better range if i commit this "upgrade" on my WL-500g? I have some problmes with the range one floor down. One floor up is no problem. But that may be because of that the ground floor consists of very much concrete, and my 2nd floor consists of wood... I don't know.
But will I get better range by doing this? And how do I do it? I have already set the TX power to 84 mW.
Thanks. And thanks for a super firmware!!!
Try it. The things are not known in advance.
When i press FINISH and SAVE/RESTART buttons on web management page, WL-500g starts rebooting, power LED goes off, but it doesn't come back again. I have to replug power cord to get it works.
Seems like problems with one unit. Another one works.
Uploaded updated firmware 1.9.2.7-5a, the changes are:
Fixed RAW printing bugs, switched to unidirectional transfers by default
Fixed support for the WPA-PSK in the Client Mode, thanks to miraculix for findings
Fixed ftp server bug, which prevented files to be uploaded to subdirectories
CET Timezone update by engy, added Czech Republic
Increased number of entries on the Bandwidth page up to 32, patch from engy
Added awk applet, applied mktime patch from engy
Applied timezones uClibc patch prepared by engy
Applied tomilius patches adding several new iptables targets
Updated WL500g Deluxe to use latest ethernet module, removed closed source binaries
Grab (http://files.wl500g.info/asus/custom/oleg/1.9.2.7-5a/) your free copy of new firmware, unzip it and flash to your router. As usual, be sure to visit my page (http://oleg.wl500g.info/) if you've not done this yet.
ths ftp server with subdirectories pb ...........still not working ....
maybe other things have to be made after the firmware upgrade ??!!!
thanks a lot
Antiloop
13-05-2005, 09:36
ths ftp server with subdirectories pb ...........still not working ....
maybe other things have to be made after the firmware upgrade ??!!!
thanks a lot
please do not shorten words, 'PB' is not a known abbrevation
I suppose you mean problem (!?)
yes i meant problem ......excuse me .....
i am french and this abrevation in FRANCE is well known ...sorry !!!!
but the problem is stiil there so .... is strange...but it s real :(
Has anyone else tried building the 1.9.2.7-5a release from the sources?. I tried serveral times but the same error apparently in patching a Makefile. I have successfully compiled the 1.9.2.7-4 sources in the past. I do the following...
tar -C . -xzf ./GPL_1927.tar.gz
tar -C ./broadcom/src -xjf ./wl500g-1.9.2.7-5a.tar.bz2
cd broadcom/src
cd *-5a
make uClibc
make kernel
make
Here is where the trouble is I get the following message
tar -C /home/d/wl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/router -cf - libcrypto | tar -C /home/d/wl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/gateway -xf -
[ ! -f libcrypto.diff ] || patch -d /home/d/wl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/gateway -p1 --no-backup-if-mismatch < libcrypto.diff
patching file libcrypto/Makefile
[ -f /home/d/wl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/gateway/Makefile ] || cp /home/dwl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/router/Makefile /home/d/wl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/gateway && patch -d /home/dwl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/gateway -p1 < Makefile.diff
patching file Makefile
[ -f /home/d/wl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/gateway/Makefiles5.mk ] || cp /home/d/l500g1927-5/broadcom/src/router/Makefiles5.* /home/d/wl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/gateway && patch -d /home/dwl500g1927-5/broadcom/src/gateway -p1 < Makefiles5.diff
/bin/sh: Makefiles5.diff: No such file or directory
make: *** [custom] Error 1
I'm not sure if I have the new step to make uClibc in the right order (it ssems like the right place). I can't find the file Makefiles5.diff anywhere. The error is in Makefile in broadcom/src/wl500g-1.9.2.7-5a.
Sorry to heap another complaint after the printer storm.
remove this line, it's no longer needed.
I would like to access my webcam picture (not the stream) (http://my.routers.ip.address:7776/display.jpg) from the internet, without having to use the password. I have STF but I could only find something with another (old) firmware. Is this possible with the 1.9.2.7-5a firmware, width og widthout modifications?
I will use the picture in my website, accessible for everyone...
Thanks. And thanks for a great forum and a great firmware.
I have STF but I could only find something with another (old) firmware. Is this possible with the 1.9.2.7-5a firmware, width og widthout modifications?
Newer firmwares includes mostly everything, that was included before, so it should work.
so what about the ftp serve subdirectories..........
somone found the solution ????
I thought when upgraded to a newer firmware. I get rid of the problem with the wanport died.
But now i have more problem with this.
My girlfriend is really mad at me.
Please help me with this problem....
If cant solve it gonna blow my wl500g into pieces.
:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Firmware: 1.9.2.7-5a is running now.
jbkerner
15-05-2005, 13:34
:D Try to put your hand on it and say "ommm".....
... or try to give a better report of your problem since you seem to be the only one with this issue on Oleg´s new release.
ciao,
JBK
i think that the update button "DDNS Setting" are a bug and dont work...
confirm please..
jbkerner
15-05-2005, 15:45
@Int: You´re right - Button doesn´t force dyndns update - but timer works fine - for me no real problem. Just an issue for the next release....
ciao,
JBK
so what about the ftp serve subdirectories..........
somone found the solution ????
Someone should at least say what is the problem exactly and provide folder/file names hierarchy. My test case works fine now.
It should work, read 1.9.2.7 CR4 thread if it does not.
Tried 1.9.2.7 CR5a, WDS with WPA/PSK AES does NOT work. (used 1.8.1.7-CR2a earlier with success).
Now using 1.9.4.0Beta with success.
Keep up good work, will use your excellent CR when it arrives for 1.9.4.0.
Someone should at least say what is the problem exactly and provide folder/file names hierarchy. My test case works fine now.
as i am french ...........sorry............i don t understand the answer :(
i read an re-read and do not understand... as i saw that it seems to
work for you ..i am expecting another answer ;)
thanks
as i am french ...........sorry............i don t understand the answer :(
i read an re-read and do not understand... as i saw that it seems to
work for you ..i am expecting another answer ;)
thanks
I need an example of failed ftp transfer. Please prepare failing directory structure, zip it and post here.
Will you release a fix for the: "et1: rx stuck suspected"? Or can I fix it my self? I get one every minute and it's clogging up my syslog..
B.
I still get this error with my wl-500gx. Was that only fixed with the wl-500g?
fraho
I still get this error with my wl-500gx. Was that only fixed with the wl-500g?
fraho
Hm... This code should never work for wl500g deluxe, as it has one ethernet controller only, and I've removed this output in all firmwares, including wl500g deluxe version. So, I'm wonder where it comes from for you. :) Do you've 1.9.2.7-5a running and use wl500g deluxe for sure?
Hm... This code should never work for wl500g deluxe, as it has one ethernet controller only, and I've removed this output in all firmwares, including wl500g deluxe version. So, I'm wonder where it comes from for you. :) Do you've 1.9.2.7-5a running and use wl500g deluxe for sure?
Hi Oleg,
:o sorry, donno why but thought I was on the deluxe version of my both routers. It's indeed the non-deluxe version logging this error....So you haven't fixed this one so far?
fraho
Hi Oleg,
:o sorry, donno why but thought I was on the deluxe version of my both routers. It's indeed the non-deluxe version logging this error....So you haven't fixed this one so far?
fraho
Fixed, have you flashed 5a? Check firmware release field, it should say 1.9.2.7-5a.
Fixed, have you flashed 5a? Check firmware release field, it should say 1.9.2.7-5a.
No, it's 5 without the a. Will I lose all my settings when upgrading to 5a?
fraho
No, it's 5 without the a. Will I lose all my settings when upgrading to 5a?
No. :mad: Please do not waste my time anymore.
I just installed this firmware, but I got a kind of seriuos problem. You see after installing I wasn't able to access my router anymore, because it didn't accept the user/pass I use. So I tried to reset it, but I still got the same message. Anyone know how I can fix this?
The default user/password is admin/admin, but it as I said don't work anymore. Does this version come with another default or something?
Antiloop
16-05-2005, 22:46
I just installed this firmware, but I got a kind of seriuos problem. You see after installing I wasn't able to access my router anymore, because it didn't accept the user/pass I use. So I tried to reset it, but I still got the same message. Anyone know how I can fix this?
The default user/password is admin/admin, but it as I said don't work anymore. Does this version come with another default or something?
read the faq: http://wl500g.info/faq.php?faq=asus_wl_x#faq_upgradedv1800
as you don't supply any information i guess this is your problem
read the faq: http://wl500g.info/faq.php?faq=asus_wl_x#faq_upgradedv1800
as you don't supply any information i guess this is your problem
Thanks. Problem solved :)
I need an example of failed ftp transfer. Please prepare failing directory structure, zip it and post here.
here is the file with all subdirectories .....only the first directory is
created ....i got the same error for the others using a ftp client :
->cannot creat file in subdirectory (the subdirectory is not created)
it says i have not the authorisation
thanks
Someone should at least say what is the problem exactly and provide folder/file names hierarchy. My test case works fine now.
Hello Oleg,
I've noticed the same problem for all your 1.9.2.7 releases :
Sometimes a LIST transfer hangs when the directory's size is greater than the MTU.
I have put a sniffer between the router and the modem and take 2 captures :
- ftp4.enc with 1.8.1.7.3
- ftp3.enc with 1.9.2.7 CR5a
In both captures i just ask for 2 different directories :
- one is very short
- on is longer
With the release 1.9, the second transfer hangs.
Ethereal signal a trouble for the 33rd frame in the file ftp4.enc (TCP previous segment lost) and this frame is not received by the FTP client (which causes the timeout).
There is also another difference between the captures : The SYN packet send by the release 1.9 ask for an MSS of 1460 bytes, whereas in release 1.8 it requires only 1452 bytes (correctly decreased by 8 for PPPoE overhead).
I hope to have helped you and keep up this good job.
How can I enable the bidirectional support for RAW printing????
I've re-uploaded files to http://oleg.wl500g.info/1.9.2.7-5/
Antiloop, please update your mirror.
Mirror hasn't been updated so far. That was the reason why I got a little confused with my installed firmware (the one without the "a") and this "et1: rx stuck suspected"-error. Could you please update it to make things clearer. Thanks!
fraho
There is also another difference between the captures : The SYN packet send by the release 1.9 ask for an MSS of 1460 bytes, whereas in release 1.8 it requires only 1452 bytes (correctly decreased by 8 for PPPoE overhead).
I hope to have helped you and keep up this good job.
Do you've iptables output for both versions? I mean output for iptables -L FORWARD -vn, also could you please try executing this command and check if it fixes this issue?
iptables -I FORWARD -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -m tcpmss --mss 1453: -j TCPMSS --set-mss 1452
How can I enable the bidirectional support for RAW printing????
You need to launch it manually by adding -b switch. Anyway, I'm absolutely sure it will not add any benefit for you. So, after initial 1.9.2.7-5 steps it was disabled by default.
Antiloop
18-05-2005, 19:42
Mirror hasn't been updated so far. That was the reason why I got a little confused with my installed firmware (the one without the "a") and this "et1: rx stuck suspected"-error. Could you please update it to make things clearer. Thanks!
fraho
mirror has been updated immediately after release of 5a
http://files.wl500g.info/asus/custom/oleg/1.9.2.7-5a/
here is the file with all subdirectories .....only the first directory is
created ....i got the same error for the others using a ftp client :
->cannot creat file in subdirectory (the subdirectory is not created)
it says i have not the authorisation
thanks
Guys, works fine for me. :) Probably you just need to use different ftp client? Personally I've used built-in ftp client from the "FAR manager".
Do you've iptables output for both versions? I mean output for iptables -L FORWARD -vn, also could you please try executing this command and check if it fixes this issue?
Here is the full log.
Inserting the command at the top of the stack solves the problem.
Thanks
Release 1.9.2.7CR5a :
[admin@wl-500g root]$ iptables -L FORWARD -vn
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 47 packets, 3585 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
15 1008 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID
0 0 ACCEPT all -- br0 br0 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
1 48 TCPMSS tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x06/0x02 tcpmss match 1453:65535TCPMSS set 1452
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x16/0x02 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x17/0x04 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5
0 0 ACCEPT icmp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5 icmp type 8
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 tcp dpts:6881:6889
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 tcp dpt:2234
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 tcp dpt:5534
0 0 ACCEPT udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 udp dpt:11676
[admin@wl-500g root]$ iptables -I FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -m tcpmss --mss 1453: -j TCPMSS --set-mss 1452
[admin@wl-500g root]$ iptables -L FORWARD -vn
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 103 packets, 6519 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
66 3168 TCPMSS tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x06/0x02 tcpmss match 1453:65535TCPMSS set 1452
810 389K ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID
0 0 ACCEPT all -- br0 br0 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
2 96 TCPMSS tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x06/0x02 tcpmss match 1453:65535TCPMSS set 1452
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x16/0x02 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x17/0x04 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5
0 0 ACCEPT icmp -- ppp0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5 icmp type 8
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 tcp dpts:6881:6889
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 tcp dpt:2234
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 tcp dpt:5534
0 0 ACCEPT udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 udp dpt:11676
Version 1.8.1.7-3
[admin@wl-500g root]$ iptables -L FORWARD -vn
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 1 packets, 48 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID
0 0 ACCEPT all -- br0 br0 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
0 0 TCPMSS tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x06/0x02 tcpmss match 1453:65535TCPMSS set 1452
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x16/0x02 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x17/0x04 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5
0 0 ACCEPT icmp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 1/sec burst 5 icmp type 8
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 tcp dpts:6881:6889
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 tcp dpt:2234
0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 tcp dpt:5534
0 0 ACCEPT udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.10 udp dpt:11676
[admin@wl-500g root]$
On WLHDD with 1.9.2.7-5a when using communication with PL2303 too many spam in log - about 100 recs/sec with this errors:
May 19 02:43:34 kernel: pl2303.c: pl2303_read_int_callback - usb_submit_urb failed with result -22
May 19 02:43:34 kernel:
May 19 02:43:34 kernel: pl2303.c: pl2303_read_int_callback - usb_submit_urb failed with result -22
May 19 02:43:34 kernel:
May 19 02:43:34 kernel: 303_read_int_callback - usb_submit_urb failed with result -22
And syslogd/klogd loads CPU on 60-80% for logs writing...
In 1.9.2.7-4 all be OK with PL2303. What is it ?
Here is the full log.
Inserting the command at the top of the stack solves the problem.
Thanks
Ok, I see now. Related connections (e.g. ftp data) are not clamped. Would be fixed.
On WLHDD with 1.9.2.7-5a when using communication with PL2303 too many spam in log - about 100 recs/sec with this errors:
May 19 02:43:34 kernel: pl2303.c: pl2303_read_int_callback - usb_submit_urb failed with result -22
May 19 02:43:34 kernel:
May 19 02:43:34 kernel: pl2303.c: pl2303_read_int_callback - usb_submit_urb failed with result -22
May 19 02:43:34 kernel:
May 19 02:43:34 kernel: 303_read_int_callback - usb_submit_urb failed with result -22
And syslogd/klogd loads CPU on 60-80% for logs writing...
In 1.9.2.7-4 all be OK with PL2303. What is it ?
Which pl2303 module version you've used with 1.9.2.7-4? Do you use built-in pl2303.o with 1.9.2.7-5a?
Im using this firmware in a WL500g.
Ok this firmware its seems to have some little problem.
I have WMM activated and i use WPA-PSK with TKIP+AES authentication.
When some specific type of wireless card connect to the network ( A2500 Laptop ) the other wirelless users( a siemens card and a aiport from mac card) are disconnected and cant connect anymore.
Ok i have a record from the log i hope you can find something (i think its because of WMM) thank you.
KillerOPS
19-05-2005, 19:19
Hello there. I tried to use ppdev.o from http://www.sephail.net/projects/openwrt/ with this firmware but no luck. The thing just freezes when i run lpif -d . I believe the problem is the kernel's version. Would be possible for you to include ppdev in the firmware, or at least to make a working copy of the module available for download?
Thank you
Im using this firmware in a WL500g.
Ok this firmware its seems to have some little problem.
I have WMM activated and i use WPA-PSK with TKIP+AES authentication.
Try disabling WMM then. In fact, I could not help with wireless stuff compatibility, as wireless part is a closed binary.
or at least to make a working copy of the module available for download?
That's it: http://wl500g.dyndns.org/bin/ppdev.o
Save it to the flashfs.
Yes thank you Oleg.
It seems with WMM desactivated this issue never happen again.
KillerOPS
20-05-2005, 18:08
Thank you, Oleg. I tried that but same thing...when i try to set something on the LPT with lpif it gives me an Segmentation fault then a reboot. I'm very intrigued by this because i have here two firmwares:
Your firmware - on which ppdev with lpif doesn't work
OpenWRT - on which my OV511-based webcam doesn't work (it just reboots after i start palantir)
=> i can't make them both work
However, I'll try to delete everything unusable from your firmware (printing, dnsmasq etc) and have another go. Maybe you can try (if you have enough free time) lpif -s 255 and lpif -s 0 on your router, to see how it handles it.
A confirmation would be very useful
Thank you again for your work and attention :)
Thank you, Oleg. I tried that but same thing...when i try to set something on the LPT with lpif it gives me an Segmentation fault then a reboot. I'm very intrigued by this because i have here two firmwares:
Your firmware - on which ppdev with lpif doesn't work
OpenWRT - on which my OV511-based webcam doesn't work (it just reboots after i start palantir)
=> i can't make them both work
However, I'll try to delete everything unusable from your firmware (printing, dnsmasq etc) and have another go. Maybe you can try (if you have enough free time) lpif -s 255 and lpif -s 0 on your router, to see how it handles it.
A confirmation would be very useful
Thank you again for your work and attention :)
parallel port stuff is not supported, as ASUS have not released source code. FYI, parallel port modules are compiled for 2.4.5 kernel, so looks like ppdev from 2.4.20 do not like this. Drop a mail to ASUS tech support about GPL violation.
I'm unwilling to play with this.
Which pl2303 module version you've used with 1.9.2.7-4? Do you use built-in pl2303.o with 1.9.2.7-5a?
In 1.9.2.7-4 i compile kernel with pl2303 which was in sources (just enable modules usbserial and pl2303 in kernel config). In 1.9.2.7-5a - I use built-in firmware pl2303, and found in your sources of firmware - pl2303 was additionally patched in 1.9.2.7-5a...
two bugs
Connect dont work after disconnect!
Update Dinamic-DNS dont work!!
....
Hi, with the latest fw my router dies everyday at 13h. I don´t now why.
my configuration is very simple, mac control and wpa-psk tkip in wireless with Manually Assigned IP List.
sys log doesn't help, because after the connnection goes down it clears itself.
with 1.9.2.7 cr5 everything was OK.
In 1.9.2.7-4 i compile kernel with pl2303 which was in sources (just enable modules usbserial and pl2303 in kernel config). In 1.9.2.7-5a - I use built-in firmware pl2303, and found in your sources of firmware - pl2303 was additionally patched in 1.9.2.7-5a...
Could you please try to found a reason for this problem? The error code returned from call is invalid arguments as seems. Unfortunatly I do not have any serial convertor around, so could not check on this.
with 1.9.2.7 cr5 everything was OK.
Try using CR5 then and check if this helps.
KillerOPS
22-05-2005, 04:16
parallel port stuff is not supported, as ASUS have not released source code. FYI, parallel port modules are compiled for 2.4.5 kernel, so looks like ppdev from 2.4.20 do not like this. Drop a mail to ASUS tech support about GPL violation.
I'm unwilling to play with this.
Well, there is a module for the parallel port, module which works on OpenWrt, so i guess it should worl here too. Here it is: http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0246517002/parport_splink.c However, I don't think it's written by ASUS, but, as i said, it works on openwrt, so why it wouldn't here?
Well, there is a module for the parallel port, module which works on OpenWrt, so i guess it should worl here too. Here it is: http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0246517002/parport_splink.c However, I don't think it's written by ASUS, but, as i said, it works on openwrt, so why it wouldn't here?
There are 3 modules, parport_splink is just one of them. We need everything.
KillerOPS
22-05-2005, 17:48
well, the two others aren't provided with the default kernel sources? (I'm assuming you are talking about parport.o and ppdev.o) Check out OpenWRT's kernel. I would use that instead, but something's wrong wit h the ov511 and/or usb
Hi,
Im using Oleg's 1.9.2.7-5a firmware, and I noticed durring a firewall test that the port 80 is open and responding, in spite of my port of web access from wan is a different port. I tested it with my dynamic IP from wan, on port 80 and the login box popped up, althoug my web access port is a different one.
Put back the 1.9.2.7-4, the port was closed, then upgraded to 7-5.a again, and the port 80 was open again!
Clould someone else check this at his/her router, please?
Thanks in advance!
Dark_Zen
22-05-2005, 19:12
Hi,
Im using Oleg's 1.9.2.7-5a firmware, and I noticed durring a firewall test that the port 80 is open and responding, in spite of my port of web access from wan is a different port. I tested it with my dynamic IP from wan, on port 80 and the login box popped up, althoug my web access port is a different one.
Put back the 1.9.2.7-4, the port was closed, then upgraded to 7-5.a again, and the port 80 was open again!
Clould someone else check this at his/her router, please?
Thanks in advance!
I'm using 1.9.2.7-5a firmware... port 80 seems to be closed.
Scanned with www.grc.com shields up utility.
tomilius
23-05-2005, 03:37
remove this line, it's no longer needed.
In regard to the Makefiles5.diff thing in the 1.9.2.7-5a patches... Maybe you could sort of fix that and reupload it so more people don't have to search the forums. :) I mean, it would be nice, unless a new release is planned soon... and even then... :D
tomilius
23-05-2005, 03:40
I'm using 1.9.2.7-5a firmware... port 80 seems to be closed.
Scanned with www.grc.com shields up utility.
Maybe your ISP blocks it.
tomilius
23-05-2005, 06:16
Gee, I'm flooding! But I have some more stuff to mention...
Another 1.9.2.7-5a thing... the Makefile uses WL500gx as the default model, which caused a bit of a headache. Maybe that was already stated, but this probably wasn't....
iplimit cannot be used as a module... it causes problems and cannot be loaded. This is a known issue--I had it before myself...
[admin@AsusRouter /]$ insmod ipt_iplimit.o
Using /lib/modules/2.4.20/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_iplimit.o
insmod: unresolved symbol ip_conntrack_find_get
So hopefully in the next version iplimit (Networking options -> IP: Netfilter Configuration -> Connections/IP limit match support) can be made built-in (or it won't work at all), and Networking options -> QoS and/or fair queueing -> Firewall based classifier can at least be compiled as a module (though I don't see how it could hurt having it built-in either).
And while I'm rambling, it might be nice if "length" (LENGTH match support) could be compiled as a module also... It helps with some traffic shaping stuff (looked up "iptables tricks" on Google... or "iptables tips," one of those).
Thanks!
Dark_Zen
23-05-2005, 17:15
Since a view days something strange occurs.
While running Azureus, browsing etc the Wan connection dies.
Lan is working perefectly. When i log on @ router and go tot status and logs and check status is see that the link status is connected.
But internet doesnt work. When 1 press 'connect' it works again!
I'm using Oleg's 1.9.2.7-5a firmware. ISP= Chello Modem+Motorola SB4200
I thought the 'wan port dies' problem should have been fixed with this firmware?
Could you please try to found a reason for this problem? The error code returned from call is invalid arguments as seems. Unfortunatly I do not have any serial convertor around, so could not check on this.
May be later (in 1.5-2 weeks) - now have no time...
Jean-Fabrice
24-05-2005, 19:29
Well, both 1.9.2.7-5 and 1.9.2.7-5a are not stables on my wiley.
I have never had such wan port dies problem or anything similar but since 1.9.2.7-5 and after, my wiley works fine for a couple a day after I flashed it, then suddenly stops giving Internet access.
When my ethernet modem is directly connected to the PC, everything works fine (means : both I and the router have Internet access).
My WAN configuration is static IP.
There are no errors at all in syslog.
After reflashing 1.9.2.7-4 and reenable flashfs (means : I use the same flash data in 1.9.2.7-5/5a and in 1.9.2.7-4) make it works like a charm.
Any hint ?
thx.
JF
JF, could you please telnet/ssh to router and try pinging your ISP? I've reworked wan port dies workaround, so probably it's causing problems somehow? Anyway, I need something to check on this.
If ping would fail - try executing "et -i eth1 promisc 0" and check again.
Thanks.
Jean-Fabrice
24-05-2005, 20:53
JF, could you please telnet/ssh to router and try pinging your ISP?
When in troubles, router doesn't have access to the internet:no DNS resolution (ping ping.symantec.com doesn't resolve), no ping (when trying to ping my wan gateway).
I've reworked wan port dies workaround, so probably it's causing problems somehow? Anyway, I need something to check on this.
If ping would fail - try executing "et -i eth1 promisc 0" and check again.
Thanks.
I have flashed 1.9.2.7-4 to be abble to work. I will reflash -5a on Thursday, wait for it to die and issue your command.
Thanks a lot.
JF
JF, before executing command above please run tcpdump to check for INCOMING traffic, once you're trying to resolve hosts. wan port dies workaround monitors transimits and then looks for receive in the next 3 seconds, if they does not come back it should reset interfaces...
@Oleg
Are you planning on implementing a newer SAMBA version as update of current or in the next firmware release, so that files larger 2 GB will not become invisible anymore?
fraho
@Oleg
Are you planning on implementing a newer SAMBA version as update of current or in the next firmware release, so that files larger 2 GB will not become invisible anymore?
fraho
Have you considered using samba ipkg?
As for firmware - I've samba 2.0.10 running already on my box, but it's really big, so I'm still thinking of it...
Have you considered using samba ipkg?
As for firmware - I've samba 2.0.10 running already on my box, but it's really big, so I'm still thinking of it...
So are you experiencing any problems because it's so big....?
fraho
So are you experiencing any problems because it's so big....?
No problems at the moment, but I just want to save more space in the flash for other usefull things.
Gee, I'm flooding! But I have some more stuff to mention...
Done everything, except default model. Buy deluxe ASAP :)
Well im here to ask and check if this behavior or bug is provoked by this firmware.
Since i changed to 1.9.2.7 CR5 Olegs... im having problems connecting to FTP's.
So the behavior is:
1st - On Lan side when i connect to any ftp there is no problem at all.
2nd -When i connect to a remote ftp(WAN) i cant transfer files at all. The file transfer will be stuck for infinite time.
3rd - In other hand when i connect to a remote ftp(WAN) withoud PASSIVE mode... im able to transfer files... but sometime one file or other gets stuck. After sometime he starts to transfer again.
Note: Sorry but i didn't put any log files... because the WL500g doesn't record anything about this in web interface.
Please check if this behavior is from this firmware because when i used 1.8.2.4 and many other firmwares i never face this problem.
Thank you.
Well im here to ask and check if this behavior or bug is provoked by this firmware.
Since i changed to 1.9.2.7 CR5 Olegs... im having problems connecting to FTP's.
So the behavior is:
1st - On Lan side when i connect to any ftp there is no problem at all.
2nd -When i connect to a remote ftp(WAN) i cant transfer files at all. The file transfer will be stuck for infinite time.
3rd - In other hand when i connect to a remote ftp(WAN) withoud PASSIVE mode... im able to transfer files... but sometime one file or other gets stuck. After sometime he starts to transfer again.
Do you use pppoe?
Yes i use pppoe connection (ADSL pppoe).
My settings for pppoe in WL500g are:
Idle Disconnect Time in seconds(option): 0
Tx Only: Uncheck
Enable PPPoE Relay?: No
MTU: Default Value
MRU: Default Value
All other fields are empty since its only required by special ISP's.
Note:In "Special Requirement from ISP" all fields are empty for the same reason.
Yes i use pppoe connection (ADSL pppoe).
This bug is fixed already, wait for next firmware release.
Ok thank you. I will wait for the next release :D :D
Lapo Luchini
28-05-2005, 13:51
Installed and everything works just perfect (IPv6 too, with sixxs.net)!
Just a question: did you forget to add traceroute6?
Was there no space for it?
Hi, I'm using 1.9.2.7 CR5 fw. I have a wlan internet connection. Everything works fine, but today I got some strange errors (when this happened, my connection stopped for 1 minute, then i worked again):
May 29 00:28:24 udhcpc[114]: Lease of 62.77.XXX.XXX obtained, lease time 3600
May 29 00:28:24 dnsmasq[50]: read /etc/hosts - 5 addresses
May 29 00:28:24 dnsmasq[50]: reading /tmp/resolv.conf
May 29 00:28:24 dnsmasq[50]: using nameserver 62.77.238.17#53
May 29 00:28:24 dnsmasq[50]: using nameserver 84.21.9.234#53
May 29 00:28:24 kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.16
May 29 00:28:24 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.
May 29 00:28:24 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10010 is small. Consider r2q chang
e.
May 29 00:28:25 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10012 is big. Consider r2q change.
May 29 00:28:25 kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.16
May 29 00:28:25 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.
May 29 00:28:25 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10010 is small. Consider r2q chang
e.
May 29 00:28:25 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10012 is big. Consider r2q change.
May 29 00:28:25 kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.16
May 29 00:28:25 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.
May 29 00:28:25 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10010 is small. Consider r2q chang
e.
May 29 00:28:26 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10012 is big. Consider r2q change.
May 29 00:28:26 dhcp client: renew IP : 62.77.XXX.XXX from 62.77.XXX.XXX
wtf is HTB and quantum of class? I have never met these expressions in networking. What does it mean?
Sincerly mADAR from Hungary
Installed and everything works just perfect (IPv6 too, with sixxs.net)!
Just a question: did you forget to add traceroute6?
Was there no space for it?
traceroute6 is missing in the busybox, so it could not be added.
May 29 00:28:26 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10012 is big. Consider r2q change.
wtf is HTB and quantum of class? I have never met these expressions in networking. What does it mean?
Well, if you'd searched with Google you would've found that it has to do with QoS and if you've searched this forum you also would've found that this isn't anything to worry about.
So, you can safely forget about it.
hello!
i fleshed this firmware on my asus and then i tryed this command:
[admin@(none) sbin]$ wshaper start
Cannot find device "root"
Error: Qdisc "1:" is classless.
Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless.
/sbin/wshaper: 69: Syntax error: 9*/10
any ideas where is problem? sor for my newb quest :confused:
[admin@(none) sbin]$ wshaper start "$1" 1000 220
Cannot find device "root"
Error: Qdisc "1:" is classless.
Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless.
Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless.
Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless.
Unknown qdisc "1:10", hence option "handle" is unparsable
Unknown qdisc "1:20", hence option "handle" is unparsable
Unknown qdisc "1:30", hence option "handle" is unparsable
Unknown filter "1:0", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
Unknown filter "1:0", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
Unknown filter "1:", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
Unknown filter "1:", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
Unknown qdisc "ffff:", hence option "ingress" is unparsable
Unknown filter "ffff:", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
this not correct so? :(
hello!
i fleshed this firmware on my asus and then i tryed this command:
[admin@(none) sbin]$ wshaper start
Cannot find device "root"
Error: Qdisc "1:" is classless.
Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless.
/sbin/wshaper: 69: Syntax error: 9*/10
any ideas where is problem? sor for my newb quest :confused:
wshaper needs more parameters, especially the device which to shape:
wshaper start eth1 1000 220
[admin@(none) sbin]$ wshaper start "$1" 1000 220
Cannot find device "root"
Error: Qdisc "1:" is classless.
Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless.
Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless.
Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless.
Unknown qdisc "1:10", hence option "handle" is unparsable
Unknown qdisc "1:20", hence option "handle" is unparsable
Unknown qdisc "1:30", hence option "handle" is unparsable
Unknown filter "1:0", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
Unknown filter "1:0", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
Unknown filter "1:", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
Unknown filter "1:", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
Unknown qdisc "ffff:", hence option "ingress" is unparsable
Unknown filter "ffff:", hence option "protocol" is unparsable
this not correct so? :(Again you've made an error in the commandline. The '$1' parameter can only be used in the post-firewall script (It's a variable in the post-firewall script, therefore the command prompt does not know what '$1' is). When you use the commandline from within a telnet session use:
wshaper start eth1 1000 220
Make sure you understand why you need to use eth1 instead of $1. Please search this forum and read the Wondershaper thread thoroughly.
tomilius
01-06-2005, 15:55
Make sure you understand why you need to use eth1 instead of $1. Please search this forum and read the Wondershaper thread thoroughly.
Or don't. It should do with a skim. Actually, I think it's a Wiki (unless you count the custom firmware page which is neither a Wiki nor a thread), and honestly, I don't see why everybody has to read something thoroughly or even understand it if they just want to get something working. I mean, I'm not quite that way--I usually like to understand it, but looking back on all of the time I spent on this router... I don't think it's even worth it considering how naturally unstable the wireless function is, seemingly no matter what driver. Ahem. Besides, the Wiki just explains some internal manipulations, and it was denounced quite recently for not being up-to-date and not explaining much.
http://chupa.nl/phpwiki/index.php/PackageWondershaper
somebody please update this wondershaper instruction.
please...
i cant make it work because i think it's for the old firmware.
now, the /init is not valid anymore.
But THIS Wiki page should be of more assistance:
http://wiki.wl500g.info/index.php/how%20to%20enable%20post%20processing%20in%201.9.2 .7-CR4%20firmware
Anyway, and sorry if I seemed rude but I just dislike the whole "read a book" philosophy when you just want to get a tiny thing working (and especially if the information isn't even fully available in that book, and especially if you have to hunt down that book first at a specified location in which it doesn't exist--and all this coming from someone who knows the answer to your question), here's a more direct approach:
1. You seem to already know the values for Download and Upload, but you can double-check them if you want.
Determine the theoretical download speed of your connection (the speed your ISP says you get). Guides seem to suggest doing the opposite and using "real-world" values, but for me they make downloads slower (e.g., choosing 3500 will limit it to about 2200 on download speed tests so I use 4500; maybe it's my ISP, do what works best, feel free to experiment and try real-world values too but only after stopping wondershaper). Couldn't hurt using the real-world upload value I guess. I only really noticed issues with using the real-world download one.
As part of step 1, you can test values and speeds by using a site such as http://performance.toast.net/ for your test site and doing the following to test:
Access your router with telnet, ssh, or whatever (telnet 192.168.1.1, usually) and log in. I assume your WAN interface is eth1. Most are. If not, try ppp0. If not, search the forum. Anyway, use the following to test wshaper, replacing WanIf with your WAN interface (try what I said for that; it's usually eth1), MaxDown with the maximum download you've calculated, and MaxUp with the maximum upload:
$ wshaper start WanIf MaxDown MaxUp
To see the status (I doubt you would ever want to), do this:
$ wshaper status WanIf
To stop wondershaper for comparative testing or whatever, do this (note that it's unnecessary to stop wondershaper before running another "wshaper start", that's done automatically):
$ wshaper stop WanIf
Now determine your best values and continue on to make them (sort of) permanent.
2. Access your router with telnet, ssh, or whatever (telnet 192.168.1.1, usually) and log in.
3. If you don't already have post-firewall set up for anything, continue reading. If you do, learn how to use vi (it's a little bit beyond the scope of even this discussion, but it's just "vi /usr/local/sbin/post-firewall", press the i key to insert anything, press ESC to get out of that mode, press a capital J to join two lines, press d twice to remove a line, press :w to save, :q! to forcibly quit, or :wq to save and quit, use the arrow keys to "move around," and that's about it I think) add the line "/sbin/wshaper start $1 MaxDown MaxUp", replacing everything in caps with what you really want, and removing the quotes :).
4. Since you don't have post-firewall set up, this should work for you every time... but "cat" it to double-check (cat /usr/local/sbin/post-firewall). If nothing shows up, yay. Read on. Otherwise, or if you want to change it, go up to step 3 (use "vi" as an editor and go into insert mode as I describe).
5. Perform this (without the $ included):
$ mkdir -p /usr/local/sbin
$ echo "#!/bin/sh" > /usr/local/sbin/post-firewall
6. Now do this, replacing MaxDown and MaxUp with the correct values:
$ echo "/sbin/wshaper start $1 MaxDown MaxUp" >> /usr/local/sbin/post-firewall
7. THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED TO SAVE EVERYTHING YOU'VE JUST DONE!
$ flashfs save
$ flashfs commit
8. Good. Now reboot to test your changes.
$ reboot
9. If you want to make sure wshaper has actually run, and correctly, you can use this, as I described in step 1:
$ wshaper status WanIf
If it's not, that will probably turn up blank or something like it.
10. Yay. Now, if it's not working, first check to see if anybody has corrected me and I haven't fixed it. Next, check your work.
Phew. OK. Again, sorry for the rudeness there Styno. I'm a little grouchy because I had to get up early... I don't drink coffee, surprisingly.
Tomillius, I appreciate you trying to help here, but I disagree with you. When someone registers here as a user, the forum rules are displayed and it would be nice if ppl followed the rules a bit better. Let me quote the first forum rule:
• Try to solve your problem first!
If you have a problem, it is the intention you open a topic at the moment you are not able to solve it anymore AFTER trying it yourself. Always read the manual and take a look at the support page of the manufacturer. Try searching google, google groups and offcourse the search function at the forum. A lot of FAQs at other forums have solutions. If a question is already asked, or it is easy to solve or find yourself, than it is not the intention to post it here.
This rule has a reason: At one point there were so many new forummembers asking the same questions over and over again, it became irritating and very time consuming for the more regular members to answer those questions. It also drowns the really intersting and new problems/solutions. In the past these kind of posts, as the one discussed here, would have been trashed by the moderators. Unfortunately, if noone steps up and tries to keep things clean here in the forum, then it would become a mess real quick. And if that makes me a bully .... ah well, I don't give a shit.
Again: The question asked here has been asked (almost) literally a few times before, so finding the appropriate info shouldn't be really that hard.
If you would like to further discuss the forum rules, this should be done through a separate thread or by PM.
tomilius
01-06-2005, 18:09
Again: The question asked here has been asked (almost) literally a few times before, so finding the appropriate info shouldn't be really that hard.
Actually, I couldn't find the answer specifically addressed after looking for a good few minutes. The Wiki was no help for newbies of the subject and should be modified.. but I don't really feel like doing it :). I understand your other points completely, though. If getting wondershaper up and running has been directly addressed anywhere else (and applicable to current-generation firmware), then I do apologize for that--I just couldn't find it in what I felt was a reasonable amount of time. And I suppose I still remember what it's like to be a newbie (at other forums in which I am no longer, that is, because I still sort of am one here).
Jean-Fabrice
01-06-2005, 18:45
excellent all ;) I love this community...
btw, tomilius, I need your help ;)
Did you notice this thread : http://wl500g.info/showthread.php?t=2541 ?
JF
This is my last post on this subject ;)
Actually, I couldn't find the answer specifically addressed after looking for a good few minutes.
- In the Wondershaper topic; exactly the same problem + the answer from Oleg: read post number 35 and 36.
- A topic about this problem + an answer: http://wl500g.info/showthread.php?t=2212
- Even Google gives the answer when searching for the error (3rd result): http://www.google.nl/search?hl=nl&q=Error%3A+Qdisc+%221%3A%22+is+classless&meta=
Pretty much proves my point :rolleyes:
About the WIKI, yes that one is rather outdated. I created *kuch* *kuch* most of those articles in the 1.7.5.9 days when I myself was a noob too. I can't find the time and spirit to do an update round. Work, forum, GF and Webtools require all my time. I was kinda hoping the community would pick it up as soon as a number of articles would be present, but not much is happening there...
tomilius
01-06-2005, 20:33
Pretty much proves my point :rolleyes:
Oh. Yeah. It was early when I posted that... or at least it was when I read that post. Kind of pathetic. The information he was looking for was there, though there was no direct, thorough guide on getting wondershaper going (if you need one, do you have any business using it anyway?), and that's what I was looking for and couldn't find. Hehe. Sorry. :D I get obsessive.
I have the same problem as tomekk.
only i have a Cabel dhcp connection.
Since i upgraded to cr5a, my wan dies.
There is no log of it in the syslog.
Is that also in the next firmware?? or do u need more info to help me out.
Well like we said in this topic for my case the solutions are:
- For WAN problem when diferents types of wireless cards connect, desactivate the WMM.
- For FTP problem you will need to wait for the next release of oleg's firmware.
All others firmware freatures are working very well..
Hi guys!!!
I've bought WL-500g recently to connect me and neighbours to Internet. I've got quite good wifi connection with public IP address. The network consists of:
- Asus WL-500g connected to Internet (ethernet WAN)
- Alfa AP set to WDS with Asus
- 3 Ovislink client devices connected to Alfa AP
- 2 my laptops connected to Asus or Alfa
I started with latest official 1.9.4.0 Beta, everybody was dancing and singing. But only until neigbour's son started with huge downloads, using Bittorent (or how's the thing called). When running that, my speed is like 10-20 kbits and ping about 3 seconds!!! The line is 512/128 kbit down/up, with 15-20 ms ping on idle.
I say OK, no problem, there's Bandwidth Management in WL-500g. I've limited his IP to 64 kbit download, it seemed to work. Next day he promised me to download only at night and I removed the limit. Obviously, he turned it on again few hours after the promise. I've set the limit again, but it didn't work any more. I was trying to set the limit again and again, the only thing I achieved was that I had to reset the Asus because it was no longer possible to connect to web interface.
After that I decided to try Oleg's 1.9.2.7 CR5a, set up Asus again and started to read about Wondershaper. I've got some Linux knowledge, but to be honest, using just web interface would be easier for me. I've tried to set the limit using web interface again and found it uses wshaper, but probably different way than described here - I've found no /usr/local/sbin/post-firewall. So, this is the story and a couple of dumb questions now:
- is it suitable for my purpose to use just web interface to set bandwidth limit???
- if I decide to set it up manually, could somebody advice me how (ports, priorities,...) and make a script for me???
- if doing it manually, there is probably some more sophisticated setting than just limit speed for one IP address. Any suggestion is welcome
- is it suitable for my purpose to use just web interface to set bandwidth limit???I think the webinterface should do the trick. It limits the total bandwith to a certain pc (not just bittorrent, but HTTP, FTP, etc. too). Don't know why it stopped working...
- if I decide to set it up manually, could somebody advice me how (ports, priorities,...) and make a script for me???
- if doing it manually, there is probably some more sophisticated setting than just limit speed for one IP address. Any suggestion is welcomeThat's a difficult one. The 'tc' (and Wondershaper) possibilities are virtually endless. Your problem can be solved in several ways, but the simplest way (which is implemented using the webinterface afaik) is to limit the bandwith to the neighbours son and to give everyone else the rest.
For the other options you could take a look at my script in the Wondershaper discussion thread (http://wl500g.info/showthread.php?t=752). It is an example of an customized Wondershaper script.
tomilius
09-06-2005, 20:01
I think possibly a bigger question you should be asking is, "do I have the time and the energy to deal with a router and its problems every few days?" For me, this router has been no picnic, and having to mess with it every 2 days is no exaggeration at all... OK, well, most of that was just customized tweaking, but I haven't found the wireless interface to be stable worth anything nor the router to be very reliable overall--that's just me, many people I'm sure have gotten it stable and set up great for their purposes, but... *shrug.* It's something to consider. I'm mostly saying this as an "I told you so," really, in case it happens to you too. ;)
Either way, welcome to the community, Pup. You may be here for a while. Muhahahahahaha! I've taken Styno's logical view on newbies (I'd be happy to explain everything, but I must restrain myself or everyone will feel they deserve equal explanation which I likely won't be willing to give a 3rd, 4th, or 5th time--I'm serious, not poking fun at anything here) :) so you'll have to do some looking around the forum and site to figure out the internal mechanisms of custom firmware and, perhaps, of linux too. I'll tell you one thing, since you mentioned it: post-firewall must be created. I guess I'll give you a link too, but just one: http://wl500g.dyndns.org/. Follow Styno's Wondershaper link (http://wl500g.info/showthread.php?t=752) as well, and you shouldn't have any trouble finding the Getting Started (http://wl500g.info/showthread.php?t=1984) section, which I've restrained myself from linking... oh, no I haven't. Now that's all. In a perfect world you'd have found and used those already, and possibly even solved your problem.
Styno & Tomilius,
thank you for quick response, guys.
Just to explain my approach. You hit the nail on the head, Tomilius. I really don't have time to become WL-500 and Linux expert. First I was just trying to work out my trouble, finding the best value for money (time, effort,...) solution, after I realized that the easy web interface setting didn't work. I understand also your approach and you might be surprised that I had read all the things you mention. I really know that post-firewall must be created and I would probably have no problem to follow step by step instructions in your post 16336 (thank you for it!!!). I just didn't find any suitable-for-dumbs-like-I-am explanation how to build the script - all the commands and their parameters. After reading all that stuff my feeling is there's a lot of useful things I can get, but it will take a lot of time to make them work, for a dumb like me. My idea was to ask somebody here to give me some template script I can just put some values (port numbers, kilobits,...) in, test and use.
Well, now I hope Styno is right and the easy way will work, to solve the trouble. Then I will see if I somebody gives me a hand or I will have time and energy to study and test all the stuff. I understand there are bunches of possibilities how to improve connection behavior, prioritizing response time sensitive applications. I like idea to protect the network funcionality against people like this "downloader".
tomilius
09-06-2005, 23:07
I just didn't find any suitable-for-dumbs-like-I-am explanation how to build the script - all the commands and their parameters.
...
I like idea to protect the network funcionality against people like this "downloader".
If you don't have the time/effort to exert on one method, another is to kick down the neighbor's door, open his BitTorrent client (you may have to get him a better one such as BitComet), and set an upload/download limit. There's another important thing. You have to limit the upload or you're screwed for the download too. That may WELL be the problem. Limit the upload to, say, 32k.
Tomillius, I can almost see you writing the stuff that you do, very illustrative :)
Pup, I', sorry, but writing a customized wshaper script will take me hours and when I send you that script you probably want something to be different so I can spend another hour or so. Then another guy steps in and say's: 'community, can you make me a script that does so and so, please?', by then I can spend all my spare time doing the hard work for others who don't have (or don't want to spend) time on it. Also we (I) don't get paid to do so, therefore I give you hits to the solution and you should figure it out by yourself. If you've studied the hints and have further question, you're welcome ofcourse.
Consider the WL-500g as a new hobby you just bought. :rolleyes:
Note: As I'm not a native English speaker, I might seem rude or blunt but it's all meant in a positive way!
I've got the message, guys :-) It just took me some time to accept the fact I've bought a toy instead of tool.
I spent last night testing. Here are my findings.
Shaping set by web interface is definitely unusable. It shapes the bandwidth, but:
- Web interface to Asus is almost unserviceable from computers with limited bandwidth. You're constantly getting error messages in IE and you have good luck if you succeed just to remove the speed limit. This is the reason why I had to reset the unit last time.
- When down- or uploading on machine with limited bandwith, you have not very slow, but even no ping. You get just timeout messages, even if pinging only the router.
After that, the decision was very easy - set up post-firewall with wshape. I also tested and proved that running upload terribly degrades downloads. It was mentioned here regarding DSL, but it's the same for Wi-Fi WAN connection.
For the beginning, I decided to use very simple scenario - put bandit's IP in low priority:
/sbin/wshaper start $1 250 120 192.168.15.6
Since he's probably out for weekend I don't know results yet. But at least upload doesn't affect download and pings are very quick even if I have upload and download running together. Big difference!!!
Dark side is that I lost more than just 10% or so of the line speed, because my connection has a special behavior, designed for browsing and against downloading. Connection speed is doubled, but only for 10 seconds. After 10 seconds of full load it slows down back to the base limit. This feature in fact doubles the speed for browsing, but I must set the basic limit in wshaper to solve troubles with up- and downloading, which slow down the connection to the base limit.
You're coming along quite well I see. The problem with bandwith shaping is indeed the fact that you need to set the highest sustained bandwith instead of the maximum. And even then you need to keep some extra headroom.
What might be a solution is to use a dynamic distribution of the available bandwith. Below is an example of a class definition where a certain base bandwith is assured, but when needed AND available, it can borrow bandwith from other classes.
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate (($UPLINK/10))kbit ceil $((9*$UPLINK/10))kbit burst 6k prio 2
Hello,
What is the diffence between the 1.9.2.7 CR5a version and the 1.9.2.7 version of the ASUS site?
What is the last stable version for the WL-500g?
thank you
You're coming along quite well I see. The problem with bandwith shaping is indeed the fact that you need to set the highest sustained bandwith instead of the maximum. And even then you need to keep some extra headroom.
What might be a solution is to use a dynamic distribution of the available bandwith. Below is an example of a class definition where a certain base bandwith is assured, but when needed AND available, it can borrow bandwith from other classes.
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate (($UPLINK/10))kbit ceil $((9*$UPLINK/10))kbit burst 6k prio 2
Dynamic distribution sounds interestingly, but I have no idea how to use it for me. The "speed doubling" is especially useful for web browsing, but when somebody starts http download and I have higher limit for http than sustained line speed, I lose all the advantages of shaping, I believe.
BTW, another side effect of shaping showed up. Web interface to Asus is (almost) unusable from Internet now - no problem from LAN, big problem from WAN. Looks that web connection to Asus via shaped interface is a problem. Not only web management, also connection to camera doesn't work. Or better, it looks that ASP pages with Java script don't work, static (display.jpg on camera) picture works.
Speaking about camera, after connecting it router's CPU runs constantly on 80-90% load by rcamd. I'm very interested how stable it will be now.
Generally, my feeling about WL-500g is that it has a lot of features, but often not finished and tuned. Also, I'm in doubts how many of them you can use at time, with respect to router's HW resources.
Dynamic distribution sounds interestingly, but I have no idea how to use it for me. The "speed doubling" is especially useful for web browsing, but when somebody starts http download and I have higher limit for http than sustained line speed, I lose all the advantages of shaping, I believe.I guess you're right about that. This dynamic behaviour of your ISP WAN connection is a problem for standard shaping stuff. I have no answer for that problem. If you're desperate you should readup on linux traffic shaping www.lartc.org.
Generally, my feeling about WL-500g is that it has a lot of features, but often not finished and tuned. Also, I'm in doubts how many of them you can use at time, with respect to router's HW resources.If it was a well polished and finished product there wouldn't be such a large community, d'you think? But anyway, try and find a product wich is significantly better at the same price compared to a WL-500g with this Oleg firmware....
I'm just a bit dissapointed that things don't work as promised. I've bought quite expensive Philips Toucam Pro II (PCVC840K) camera and I can get only very compressed 320x240 static JPEG from Internet. ActiveX streaming stuff works nicely, but only from LAN/WLAN. Motion detection also doesn't work, it's only bombing me with e-mails when I hot plug the camera with Sense Level set to High or Medium, regardless any motion in front of the camera. After reboot I get no e-mail any more.
Yes, I know I can get another PWC driver and set it to 640x480, I can also get much better motion detection software, put all that stuff to USB memory stick and start to play. I would do it (and love it) if I were ten, twenty years younger.....
Just one question. I cannot connect to Asus using Telnet from Internet. I've set port forwarding (virtual server in web interface) of port 23 external IP to the same port on internal IP, it doesn't work. I use port forward for web access to the other AP and all client devices in WLAN, without trouble. What's wrong?
I'm just a bit dissapointed that things don't work as promised.Promised? I've never promised anything. You're better ask ASUS tech support and not use this thread.
Promised? I've never promised anything. You're better ask ASUS tech support and not use this thread.
Sorry, Oleg, but you should understand I didn't complain about your work. Since I never bought anything from you I can hardly criticise you. Wrong place, you're right.
Hi,
just for peoples who don't know, why your CAM doesn't show larger pages :eek:
It isn't OLEG's fault, to look behind the szene you need to take a look at this Page:
http://www.smcc.demon.nl/webcam/
This page tells you the storry about the PWC Sources from the original author
and why his support ended.
And this Page:
http://www.saillard.org/linux/pwc/
This Author took over the ended work from the one above and is trying to get a complete new Kernel-Module working on this compression stuff he still is working (I think).
To complete the Storry who's fault it is !!!
it's the Fault from Br...c.m/A..S/D-.... and others, why ???
Well, just because the Firms mentioned above doesn't give out the Sources for the WLan and Ethernet Modules, and because of this we can't build one of the newest kernel where the new PWC-Module would like to work with (It dont like the older 2.4'er Series anymore).
I even tried to build the newest 2.4.31'er kernel with success, the only problem we have, how to get the f.. oooops sorry
The nice wl.o Module to work with the newer kernel since we don't have the Source we aren't be able to modify the structure to get it to work with the newer kernel. We don't even know how to patch the kernel.
And don't even think about the 2.6'er kernel versions. Since the complete WL-XXX productline is sold with a complete GNU-based enviroment the owner should give this Sources back to the GNU-Comunity, they are trying to turn us dumm, when they give just about 90% of it out, but the rest of 10% the driver, which is needed to get this thing done, is missing only the old stuff from 2.4.20 is there and a pre compiled kernel module.
And when you try to get all the Information together, then you will notice, that all Firms that sell products based on that Br...... Components, just give never away a newer kernel as the the 2.4.20.
A..S tried to be smart and was trying to patch the older 2.4.20' kernel with some USB-Stuff from the 2.4.25' Version, just to open the possibility for newer USB-Stuff to add.
To get a working Kernel for this MIPSy thing isn't that hard, it took me about 3 days to get the new kernel from
http://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/Main_Page
compiled with the normal-Board stuff from BR...... inside of it, but if it comes to the Ethernet/Wireless stuff, I was lost in the air. I just noticed it as soon as the kernel compiled through and I was ready to build the TRX-Image for my nice little WL-HDD thing. It don't like to mix the kernelversion (wl.o for kernel 2.4.20 and the new 2.4.31 don't like each other)
To bad :mad: , that I figured everything out, as I ended with the kernel and glued everything together. (oops why it doesn't work :confused: )
If you like and have a linux system up and running, get the stuff from here:
http://dlsvr01.asus.com/pub/ASUS/wireless/WL-500g-03/GPL_1927.zip
than the newest costimized collection from OLEG
and if you like to try the latest and last pwc stuff for the 2.4.'er kernel series
take a look at here:
http://wl500g.info/showthread.php?t=2551
()everything you need inclusive all patches)
And go ahead cooking :D :D :D .
If you know a little kernel-hacking then try to get the wl.o module to gether wih a kernelversion 2.6 Working, if you are good in reverse engineering, then I think you would make those people here :
http://linux-bcom4301.sourceforge.net/go/progress
and other points in the internet happy and us of course too.
This Posting wasn't ment to be a picks or a hit to you or others here in the Forum, I wrote this just because it took myself a lot time for collecting all this Information.
By the way if you would like to help us getting the sources and you are rich ?? then take a look here ??
http://gpl-violations.org/index.html
But as far as I understand all this things with my normal english, I think the GPL-Violation.org only try to get the firms to tell on there Homepages, that they are using GPL'ed Software. Some of them which this site talk about success are just showing the Links to the Homepages, where they got the Sources from to build the Firmware fora minimum amount of dollars for a maximum business !!!
But they don't show how nor even tell and don't think about the sources.
I think that's the complete storry if I made any mistakes sorry fell free to correct me, and before I forget every name beloning to a firm or is trademarked by a firm belongs to this firm etc.
Sorry for my bad english, I'm german ;) ;)
@PUP:
If you are upset with the current Situation, feel free to contact your lawer for a expensive fight against br.., AS..., D-L..., lev.. O.., Longs...., etc.
But like I said above, I thnk the main Problem is Bro..c.m since the other are just bying the whole stuff from them !!
I think the complete sources are to expensive instead fof just a kernel-module.
We will see, when A..S give out the new 1.9.4.xx Version Firmware for the wl500g ;-)
If they are still sitting on this kernel release, it realy looks like as they don't have the full sources (that's my my opinion)
zerokewl
17-06-2005, 20:22
Hi all,
I am using also firmware version 1.9.2.7-5a on my 500g and it's working perfectly for my Windows notebook using WPA-PSK.
Also it's no problem to connect to the router using a Mac with OS/X 10.4 (Tiger) installed. Problem is, that that the Mac is unable to reconnect after waking up from sleep mode. You'll have to choose the connection manually again providing network name, encryption type and pre-shared key.
Maybe others here have encountered the same problem meanwhile and can give me some help because I really don't have any idea where to search for...
Greetz, Lars
Hi all,
I am using also firmware version 1.9.2.7-5a on my 500g and it's working perfectly for my Windows notebook using WPA-PSK.
Also it's no problem to connect to the router using a Mac with OS/X 10.4 (Tiger) installed. Problem is, that that the Mac is unable to reconnect after waking up from sleep mode. You'll have to choose the connection manually again providing network name, encryption type and pre-shared key.
Maybe others here have encountered the same problem meanwhile and can give me some help because I really don't have any idea where to search for...
Greetz, Lars
Looks like Mac OS or driver problem. I had similar problems with windows 2000 and orinoco gold card.
Hi there!
First of all, thank you for this great firmware !
I've been using the custom firmwares for a while now and every time there is a new version, the wan connection seemd to be more more stable, but sice xxxx-5a I have to reset my router every 2 weeks. And in the last 48 hours, I had to reset it twice. Here is the logfile:
...
Jun 17 16:41:23 kernel: ACCEPT IN=ppp0 OUT=br0 SRC=xx.xxx.xx.xxx DST=192.168.1.4 LEN=86 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=121 ID=39767 PROTO=UDP SPT=xxx DPT=xxx LEN=66
Jun 17 16:42:29 pppd[78]: No response to 6 echo-requests
Jun 17 16:42:29 pppd[78]: Serial link appears to be disconnected.
Jun 17 16:42:29 dnsmasq[48]: read /etc/hosts - 4 addresses
Jun 17 16:42:29 dnsmasq[48]: reading /tmp/resolv.conf
Jun 17 16:42:29 dnsmasq[48]: using nameserver 212.7.148.97#53
Jun 17 16:42:29 PPPoE: Disconnected
Jun 17 16:42:35 pppd[78]: Connection terminated.
Jun 17 16:42:35 pppd[78]: Connect time 18650381.3 minutes.
Jun 17 16:42:35 pppd[78]: Sent 170777226 bytes, received 405843756 bytes.
Jun 17 16:43:40 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:43:40 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:44:45 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:44:45 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:45:50 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:45:50 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:46:55 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:46:55 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:48:00 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:48:00 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:48:29 kernel: ACCEPT IN=br0 OUT=br0 SRC=192.168.1.4 DST=192.168.1.4 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=127 ID=36142 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1732 DPT=xxx SEQ=3733679510 ACK=0 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (0204057E01010402)
Jun 17 16:49:05 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:49:05 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:50:10 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:50:10 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:51:15 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:51:15 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:52:20 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:52:20 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:53:25 pppd[78]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
Jun 17 16:53:25 pppd[78]: Unable to complete PPPoE Discovery
Jun 17 16:53:25 pppd[78]: Connect time 18650381.3 minutes.
Jun 17 16:53:25 pppd[78]: Sent 170777226 bytes, received 405843756 bytes.
Jun 17 16:53:25 pppd[78]: Exit.
Jun 17 17:03:49 kernel: ACCEPT IN=br0 OUT=br0 SRC=192.168.1.4 DST=192.168.1.4 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=127 ID=45052 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1818 DPT=xxx SEQ=2725907500 ACK=0 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (0204057E01010402)
Jun 17 17:05:15 ntp client: Synchronizing time with time.nist.gov ...
Jun 17 19:05:15 ntp client: Synchronizing time with time.nist.gov ...
If you have any idea, what the problem might be???
If you have any idea, what the problem might be???
Yes, wait for 1.9.2.7-6.
Devil-Strike
18-06-2005, 12:07
Yes, wait for 1.9.2.7-6.
Whene comes 1.9.2.7-6? and comes snmp also in this 1?