Excellent. Did you use the Unslung packages, or some other source? Since a lot of those packages are GPL, then you should really have the source and Makefiles published somewhere too. If they are just the Unslung packages, then just point people to the Unslung CVS module of nslu.sf.net ... and please contribute back any patches you needed to make for mipsel and uclibc, so that we can add them to the CVS repository for everyone to benefit from (we have set it up so the packages can be built for both the NSLU2 and the wl500g).Originally Posted by Jean-Fabrice
In the NSLU2-Linux project, we have discouraged people from distributing binary ipks without accompanying source code. Instead we give people access to the CVS repository on sf.net so they can contribute the package makefiles and patches directly, and then those packages are regularly built and published in the official ipk repository by the Unslung package release manager.
OpenWRT seems to take the other approach, where everyone publishes their own ipkg binary download areas, and there are a number of them without accompanying source code as far as I can see (there are notable exceptions - some people have their complete build system published alongside the ipkg repository).
Oleg, what is your intention for the wl500g ipkgs ? Is there going to be a central source code repository (like the Unslung CVS repository), where people contribute makefiles and patches, and those packages are built by a central (and trusted) person or persons and uploaded to an official ipkg repository, or is it going to be a free-for-all where there are many different ipkg repositories for the wl500g (with some of them not having source code available) ?
I for one, (for security reasons) would never install a package for which I did not have access to the source code. It is just too easy for someone to insert a Trojan and take control of your complete LAN and all passwords travelling across it. I am *not* suggesting that this is the case for Jean-Fabrice's packages :-)
-- Rod