Page 43 of 48 FirstFirst ... 334142434445 ... LastLast
Results 631 to 645 of 713

Thread: New oleg firmware version

  1. #631
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands - Eindhoven
    Posts
    1,763
    not quite sure if this is a firmware problem:
    Feb 21 01:40:10 kernel: transmission-da: page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x4020
    Feb 21 01:40:10 kernel: Call Trace:
    Feb 21 01:40:10 kernel: [<80004fe0>] memset+0x0/0x1c
    Feb 21 01:40:10 kernel: [<c00f6c2c>] et_link_up+0x2a4c/0x2cd0 [et]
    Feb 21 01:40:10 kernel: [<c00f53f0>] et_link_up+0x1210/0x2cd0 [et]
    Feb 21 01:40:10 kernel: [<c00f5418>] et_link_up+0x1238/0x2cd0 [et]
    Feb 21 01:40:10 kernel: [<802f0000>] cpu_cache_init+0x50/0x6c
    Feb 21 01:40:10 kernel: [<c00f5830>] et_link_up+0x1650/0x2cd0 [et]
    Feb 21 01:40:10 kernel: [<8000150c>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:2432 kfree()
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: Call Trace:
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: [<802f0000>] cpu_cache_init+0x50/0x6c
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: [<c00f5830>] et_link_up+0x1650/0x2cd0 [et]
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: [<8000150c>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:2432 kfree()
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: Call Trace:
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: [<802f0000>] cpu_cache_init+0x50/0x6c
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:2432 kfree()
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: Call Trace:
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: [<802f0000>] cpu_cache_init+0x50/0x6c
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: [<c00f5830>] et_link_up+0x1650/0x2cd0 [et]
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: [<8000150c>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: [<80003204>] stack_done+0x20/0x40
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:2432 kfree()
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: Call Trace:
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: [<80003204>] stack_done+0x20/0x40
    Feb 21 01:40:11 kernel: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:2432 kfree()
    I do know it kills my router frequently

    I've already increased the min_free_kbytes option since... a long long time, but it's not good enough anymore
    echo 8192 > /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes

  2. #632

    WL500gp-1.9.2.7-rtn-r3702.trx WDS Problem

    Hello,
    I have a router WL500gp with WL500gp-1.9.2.7-rtn-r3702.trx
    I use WDS and it does not connect. With the software WL500gp-1.9.2.7-d-r2624 i do not have any problems.

    What could be the problem?

    Best regards

    mimiko

  3. #633
    Quote Originally Posted by wpte View Post
    not quite sure if this is a firmware problem:

    I do know it kills my router frequently
    I do observe something similar after some time running the router:
    Code:
    $ dmesg
    art_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<80001524>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    [<80006470>] schedule+0x41c/0xb9c
    [<80006518>] schedule+0x4c4/0xb9c
    [<800081cc>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0xec/0x17c
    [<c029a228>] wlc_phytxctl1_calc+0x2198/0x303c [wl]
    [<c029d104>] wlc_prep_sdu+0x810/0x1590 [wl]
    [<c032e0b4>] wlc_phy_chanspec_get+0x0/0x8 [wl]
    [<80004de0>] memcpy+0x0/0x4
    [<c029aa68>] wlc_phytxctl1_calc+0x29d8/0x303c [wl]
    [<c029d104>] wlc_prep_sdu+0x810/0x1590 [wl]
    [<c02a6d20>] wlc_dpc+0x710/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<c029e058>] wlc_send_q+0x1d4/0x7f4 [wl]
    [<c02a6d20>] wlc_dpc+0x710/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<800032f0>] stack_done+0x20/0x40
    
    WARNING: at mm/slub.c:2432 kfree()
    Call Trace:
    [<c029c0c0>] wlc_dotxstatus+0xbe8/0x11fc [wl]
    [<c02a7280>] wlc_scbfind+0x0/0xd4 [wl]
    [<c02a6d94>] wlc_dpc+0x784/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<c0296e38>] wl_intrson+0x228/0x3bc [wl]
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<80001524>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    [<80006470>] schedule+0x41c/0xb9c
    [<80006518>] schedule+0x4c4/0xb9c
    [<800081cc>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0xec/0x17c
    [<c029a228>] wlc_phytxctl1_calc+0x2198/0x303c [wl]
    [<c029d104>] wlc_prep_sdu+0x810/0x1590 [wl]
    [<c032e0b4>] wlc_phy_chanspec_get+0x0/0x8 [wl]
    [<80004de0>] memcpy+0x0/0x4
    [<c029aa68>] wlc_phytxctl1_calc+0x29d8/0x303c [wl]
    [<c029d104>] wlc_prep_sdu+0x810/0x1590 [wl]
    [<c02a6d20>] wlc_dpc+0x710/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<c029e058>] wlc_send_q+0x1d4/0x7f4 [wl]
    [<c02a6d20>] wlc_dpc+0x710/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<800032f0>] stack_done+0x20/0x40
    
    .
    .
    .
    .
    
    WARNING: at mm/slub.c:2432 kfree()
    Call Trace:
    [<c02a0a18>] wlc_recvdata+0xa60/0xdf4 [wl]
    [<c029e0dc>] wlc_send_q+0x258/0x7f4 [wl]
    [<c029c0c0>] wlc_dotxstatus+0xbe8/0x11fc [wl]
    [<c02a6d94>] wlc_dpc+0x784/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<c0296e38>] wl_intrson+0x228/0x3bc [wl]
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<80001524>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    [<80001524>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    [<800032f0>] stack_done+0x20/0x40
    With this, it seems that my router is not reachable via Web-IF (ssh works, though).
    After reboot, no message like this and everything is fine.

  4. #634
    It seems, that the avove problem stems from the usage of transmission?

    transmission itself gives me the following "hints" at startup:
    Code:
    $ EVENT_NOEPOLL=1 transmission-daemon -f --log-debug
    [20:35:34.294] Transmission 2.50 (13228) started (session.c:718)
    [20:35:34.296] Cache Maximum cache size set to 2.00 MiB (128 blocks) (cache.c:249)
    [20:35:34.297] RPC Server Adding address to whitelist: *.*.*.* (rpc-server.c:803)
    [20:35:34.298] RPC Server Serving RPC and Web requests on port 127.0.0.1:9091/transmission/ (rpc-server.c:997)
    [20:35:34.299] RPC Server Whitelist enabled (rpc-server.c:1001)
    [20:35:34.300] Bound socket 10 to port 51413 on 0.0.0.0 (net.c:371)
    [20:35:34.300] Bound socket 11 to port 51413 on :: (net.c:371)
    [20:35:34.301] UDP Failed to set receive buffer: requested 4194304, got 221184 (tr-udp.c:75)
    [20:35:34.304] UDP Please add the line "net.core.rmem_max = 4194304" to /etc/sysctl.conf (tr-udp.c:80)
    [20:35:34.305] UDP Failed to set send buffer: requested 1048576, got 221184 (tr-udp.c:86)
    [20:35:34.306] UDP Please add the line "net.core.wmem_max = 1048576" to /etc/sysctl.conf (tr-udp.c:91)
    .
    .
    .
    [20:35:34.313] Port Forwarding (NAT-PMP) initnatpmp succeeded (0) (natpmp.c:72)
    [20:35:34.314] Port Forwarding (NAT-PMP) sendpublicaddressrequest succeeded (2) (natpmp.c:72)
    [20:35:34.315] Port Forwarding (UPnP) UPNP_GetValidIGD failed (errno 0 - Success) (upnp.c:214)
    [20:35:34.316] Port Forwarding (UPnP) If your router supports UPnP, please make sure UPnP is enabled! (upnp.c:217)
    [20:35:34.317] Port Forwarding Starting (port-forwarding.c:93)
    .
    .
    .
    May this be related?
    Does the Asus provide a "/etc/sysctl.conf" (I couldn't find one)?
    Should I create one?

    Regarding the ports-problems --> what is the preferred way to enable UPnP?

    Thanks for help,
    pheidrias

    PS:
    my transmission config:
    Code:
    cat .config/transmission-daemon/settings.json 
    {
        "alt-speed-down": 50, 
        "alt-speed-enabled": false, 
        "alt-speed-time-begin": 540, 
        "alt-speed-time-day": 127, 
        "alt-speed-time-enabled": false, 
        "alt-speed-time-end": 1020, 
        "alt-speed-up": 50, 
        "bind-address-ipv4": "0.0.0.0", 
        "bind-address-ipv6": "::", 
        "blocklist-enabled": false, 
        "blocklist-url": "http://www.example.com/blocklist", 
        "cache-size-mb": 2, 
        "dht-enabled": true, 
        "download-dir": "/tmp/harddisk/transmission/download", 
        "download-queue-enabled": true, 
        "download-queue-size": 5, 
        "encryption": 0, 
        "idle-seeding-limit": 30, 
        "idle-seeding-limit-enabled": false, 
        "incomplete-dir": "/usr/local/root/Downloads", 
        "incomplete-dir-enabled": false, 
        "lpd-enabled": false, 
        "message-level": 3, 
        "peer-congestion-algorithm": "", 
        "peer-limit-global": 240, 
        "peer-limit-per-torrent": 60, 
        "peer-port": 51413, 
        "peer-port-random-high": 65535, 
        "peer-port-random-low": 49152, 
        "peer-port-random-on-start": false, 
        "peer-socket-tos": "default", 
        "pex-enabled": true, 
        "port-forwarding-enabled": true, 
        "preallocation": 1, 
        "prefetch-enabled": 0, 
        "queue-stalled-enabled": true, 
        "queue-stalled-minutes": 30, 
        "ratio-limit": 2, 
        "ratio-limit-enabled": false, 
        "rename-partial-files": true, 
        "rpc-authentication-required": false, 
        "rpc-bind-address": "0.0.0.0", 
        "rpc-enabled": true, 
        "rpc-password": "whoknows", 
        "rpc-port": 9091, 
        "rpc-url": "/transmission/", 
        "rpc-username": "", 
        "rpc-whitelist": "*.*.*.*", 
        "rpc-whitelist-enabled": true, 
        "scrape-paused-torrents-enabled": true, 
        "script-torrent-done-enabled": false, 
        "script-torrent-done-filename": "", 
        "seed-queue-enabled": false, 
        "seed-queue-size": 10, 
        "speed-limit-down": 100, 
        "speed-limit-down-enabled": false, 
        "speed-limit-up": 100, 
        "speed-limit-up-enabled": false, 
        "start-added-torrents": true, 
        "trash-original-torrent-files": false, 
        "umask": 18, 
        "upload-slots-per-torrent": 14, 
        "utp-enabled": true
    }

  5. #635
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Russia, Moscow
    Posts
    3,583
    Quote Originally Posted by pheidrias View Post
    Does the Asus provide a "/etc/sysctl.conf" (I couldn't find one)?
    No, it not included for size reason. You have to directly write to:
    PHP Code:
    /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max
    /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max 

  6. #636

    Exclamation N16 support hardware nat in the latest firmware?

    Is this true?

    It says download speed 903Mbps, upload speed 628Mbps

    Last edited by snowx; 26-03-2012 at 12:17.

  7. #637
    Quote Originally Posted by pheidrias View Post
    I do observe something similar after some time running the router:
    Code:
    $ dmesg
    art_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<80001524>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    [<80006470>] schedule+0x41c/0xb9c
    [<80006518>] schedule+0x4c4/0xb9c
    [<800081cc>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0xec/0x17c
    [<c029a228>] wlc_phytxctl1_calc+0x2198/0x303c [wl]
    [<c029d104>] wlc_prep_sdu+0x810/0x1590 [wl]
    [<c032e0b4>] wlc_phy_chanspec_get+0x0/0x8 [wl]
    [<80004de0>] memcpy+0x0/0x4
    [<c029aa68>] wlc_phytxctl1_calc+0x29d8/0x303c [wl]
    [<c029d104>] wlc_prep_sdu+0x810/0x1590 [wl]
    [<c02a6d20>] wlc_dpc+0x710/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<c029e058>] wlc_send_q+0x1d4/0x7f4 [wl]
    [<c02a6d20>] wlc_dpc+0x710/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<800032f0>] stack_done+0x20/0x40
    
    WARNING: at mm/slub.c:2432 kfree()
    Call Trace:
    [<c029c0c0>] wlc_dotxstatus+0xbe8/0x11fc [wl]
    [<c02a7280>] wlc_scbfind+0x0/0xd4 [wl]
    [<c02a6d94>] wlc_dpc+0x784/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<c0296e38>] wl_intrson+0x228/0x3bc [wl]
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<80001524>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    [<80006470>] schedule+0x41c/0xb9c
    [<80006518>] schedule+0x4c4/0xb9c
    [<800081cc>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0xec/0x17c
    [<c029a228>] wlc_phytxctl1_calc+0x2198/0x303c [wl]
    [<c029d104>] wlc_prep_sdu+0x810/0x1590 [wl]
    [<c032e0b4>] wlc_phy_chanspec_get+0x0/0x8 [wl]
    [<80004de0>] memcpy+0x0/0x4
    [<c029aa68>] wlc_phytxctl1_calc+0x29d8/0x303c [wl]
    [<c029d104>] wlc_prep_sdu+0x810/0x1590 [wl]
    [<c02a6d20>] wlc_dpc+0x710/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<c029e058>] wlc_send_q+0x1d4/0x7f4 [wl]
    [<c02a6d20>] wlc_dpc+0x710/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327a00>] start_kernel+0x2c/0x4c4
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<800032f0>] stack_done+0x20/0x40
    
    .
    .
    .
    .
    
    WARNING: at mm/slub.c:2432 kfree()
    Call Trace:
    [<c02a0a18>] wlc_recvdata+0xa60/0xdf4 [wl]
    [<c029e0dc>] wlc_send_q+0x258/0x7f4 [wl]
    [<c029c0c0>] wlc_dotxstatus+0xbe8/0x11fc [wl]
    [<c02a6d94>] wlc_dpc+0x784/0xa70 [wl]
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<c0296e38>] wl_intrson+0x228/0x3bc [wl]
    [<80327e00>] start_kernel+0x42c/0x4c4
    [<80001524>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    [<80001524>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
    [<800032f0>] stack_done+0x20/0x40
    With this, it seems that my router is not reachable via Web-IF (ssh works, though).
    After reboot, no message like this and everything is fine.
    you may try to re-compile whole firmware with SLAB allocator turned on by default in kernel, maybe it'd help (by default SLUB is selected).

    it helped me to reduce load on my wl500gP equipped with BCM43222.

    Quote Originally Posted by pheidrias View Post
    Regarding the ports-problems --> what is the preferred way to enable UPnP?

    Thanks for help,
    pheidrias
    Check Virtual Server in WEB interface, I do not trust uPNP, better forward certain ports to your computer/router.
    Last edited by staticroute; 06-06-2012 at 03:46. Reason: add

  8. #638
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands - Eindhoven
    Posts
    1,763
    Quote Originally Posted by staticroute View Post
    you may try to re-compile whole firmware with SLAB allocator turned on by default in kernel, maybe it'd help (by default SLUB is selected).

    it helped me to reduce load on my wl500gP equipped with BCM43222.

    Well you can easily configure this in post-boot
    echo 256960 > /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_default
    echo 256960 > /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max
    echo 256960 > /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default
    echo 256960 > /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max
    I've even added some extra settings:
    echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
    echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
    echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling
    echo 30 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout
    echo 30 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_intvl
    echo 5 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_probes
    echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_tw_recycle
    echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_tw_reuse
    turning off the tcp_timestamps actually gives me 200-300KB/s extra speed
    note that this might break some traffic, but timestamps are hardly used in my experience


    Quote Originally Posted by staticroute View Post
    Check Virtual Server in WEB interface, I do not trust uPNP, better forward certain ports to your computer/router.
    True... but it's easy
    If you run a tight ship when it comes to security, you should be good. If you don't it's not that smart.


    btw, does anyone have experience with a 3TB harddisk and oleg?
    Can I just create one giant 3TB partition? I know windows has troubles with it, but I'm not sure about linux
    Last edited by wpte; 06-06-2012 at 18:38.

  9. #639
    Quote Originally Posted by wpte View Post
    Well you can easily configure this in post-boot


    I've even added some extra settings:


    turning off the tcp_timestamps actually gives me 200-300KB/s extra speed
    note that this might break some traffic, but timestamps are hardly used in my experience



    True... but it's easy
    If you run a tight ship when it comes to security, you should be good. If you don't it's not that smart.


    btw, does anyone have experience with a 3TB harddisk and oleg?
    Can I just create one giant 3TB partition? I know windows has troubles with it, but I'm not sure about linux
    there is a GUID support inside 2.6.22.19 kernel firmware by default, it should work I think.

    about NAT ports, well you just need to forward certain applications which you really need, ofc you need to use latest version and patch them.

  10. #640
    Quote Originally Posted by wpte View Post
    I know windows has troubles with it, but I'm not sure about linux
    It doesn't depend on the OS alone. The filesystem is imho more important.

    ext4 for example supports volumes up to 1 Exbibyte where ext3 supports max 16 Tebibyte per volume...
    (yes I really try following IEEE 1541 suggestions )
    RT-N66U TomatoUSB 1.28.0000 MIPSR2-121 K26AC USB AIO-64K running Entware
    lighttpd 1.4.3.0 php 5.4.5 eaccelerator sqlite
    pyload 0.4.10
    minidlna 1.1.2
    samba 3.6.5

    ̶W̶L̶5̶0̶0̶g̶P̶ ̶1̶.̶9̶.̶2̶.̶7̶-̶r̶t̶n̶-̶r̶4̶7̶5̶0 retired

  11. #641
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands - Eindhoven
    Posts
    1,763
    Quote Originally Posted by staticroute View Post
    there is a GUID support inside 2.6.22.19 kernel firmware by default, it should work I think.
    Quote Originally Posted by !gm View Post
    It doesn't depend on the OS alone. The filesystem is imho more important.

    ext4 for example supports volumes up to 1 Exbibyte where ext3 supports max 16 Tebibyte per volume...
    (yes I really try following IEEE 1541 suggestions )
    Good good
    I'm thinking about using EXT4 for a new drive. With all the backports in oleg it does run nicely

  12. #642
    Quote Originally Posted by wpte View Post
    Good good
    I'm thinking about using EXT4 for a new drive. With all the backports in oleg it does run nicely
    yes, but still 2.6 seems to be a lot more buggy than 2.4 branch, at least for me..

    without custom configuration of kernel it's useless for me..

  13. #643
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands - Eindhoven
    Posts
    1,763
    Quote Originally Posted by staticroute View Post
    yes, but still 2.6 seems to be a lot more buggy than 2.4 branch, at least for me..

    without custom configuration of kernel it's useless for me..
    buggy? I prefer the 2.6 kernel a lot over the 2.4 one tbh.

  14. #644
    Quote Originally Posted by wpte View Post
    buggy? I prefer the 2.6 kernel a lot over the 2.4 one tbh.
    may I ask what is your router model?

    mine is WL500gP v1

  15. #645
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands - Eindhoven
    Posts
    1,763
    Quote Originally Posted by staticroute View Post
    may I ask what is your router model?

    mine is WL500gP v1
    RT-N16
    I also have a WL-500W as wireless ethernet bridge with 2.6, including some oleg opkg packages
    I actually noticed wifi improvements for my WL-500W. It's stronger and faster

    I'm waiting silently waiting for my RT-N66U to get oleg as well (not trying to rush the devs )

Page 43 of 48 FirstFirst ... 334142434445 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Probleme mit der Oleg firmware
    By errox in forum German Discussion - Deutsch (DE)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 14-06-2008, 22:26
  2. new firmware 1.9.2.7-8 by oleg
    By alien433 in forum WL-500gP Firmware Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 24-01-2008, 20:31
  3. Oleg firmware not working.
    By wpte in forum WL-500gP Q&A
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-01-2008, 12:48
  4. C Compiler voor de oleg firmware
    By wouzs in forum Dutch Discussion - Nederlands
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-10-2007, 15:57

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •