View Poll Results: Have you tried new 1.9.2.7 audio features?

Voters
142. You may not vote on this poll
  • They're useless

    47 33.10%
  • They never worked for me, but I would like to use them

    12 8.45%
  • Works fine for me

    32 22.54%
  • Have no idea about these features

    51 35.92%
Results 1 to 15 of 50

Thread: 1.9.2.7 Audio features

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Vienna
    Posts
    41

    unneded?

    I removed both audio and video modules from the linux-src
    (via make menuconfig)

    for me it's ok

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the netherlands
    Posts
    155
    It is the most useless feature I have seen so far. I wonder if there are people that hook up a webcam to it or usb speakers anyways.

    Would be nice to free up the memory to make room for something useful.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Russian Federation
    Posts
    8,356
    Well, I think ASUS should concentrate on fixing existing bugs rather than add new "features", which are totally useless for router box.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the netherlands
    Posts
    155
    I agree, like hooking up usb speakers will help sell this thing because it has got a unique selling point.

    Personally I don't think there is a single soul on earth that wanted to hook up speakers to an access point / router in the first place.

    And you are totally right about fixing bugs first before putting in new features. Get all the current things running nicely first, and once that is done, develop something useful for it.

    Like ip6 support for it, or vpn services

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Vienna
    Posts
    41

    asus vs. "homemade"

    leave asus-guys working...they create their firmware for end-users.

    It think it's better to patch their sources to remove uneeded tools to be able to add more needed ones.
    (btw, why are iptables patched to remove "multiport"?)

    In the case, somebody wants to compile them in...he will be provided with input on how to do it.

    Keep it small, keep it simple

  6. #6
    Well, I'm using the webcam on daily basis, but using other pwc.o and using palantir. Audio could be usefull for someone with the right speakers, but this should be a remote part of the router users.
    So audio is useless, video is not (in fact, it was a selling point for me).

  7. #7
    Im on Hugos line, cam is good, audio is less.
    I use two 500g in WDS mode to get a link between two buildings and the support for camera is a superb function for me todo supervising off the buildings.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    70
    This exacltly the thing I wanted to make clear in the topic "features or stability"

    I think there are much more important things to fix that only introduce features that look nice on the package.

Similar Threads

  1. Features or stability???
    By i-beast-a in forum WL-500g Q&A
    Replies: 152
    Last Post: 01-09-2005, 16:59
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 19-04-2005, 10:59
  3. Witch features are implemented in Samba?
    By Ikke in forum WL-500g Q&A
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20-08-2004, 09:18
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-04-2004, 21:49
  5. New Features
    By njs in forum WL-500g Q&A
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-01-2004, 16:49

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •